Evaluating AI-Enabled Voice to Text for Medical Affairs Documentation and Insight Capture: The RAPID Randomized Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) transcription systems using large language models (LLMs) and natural language processing (NLP) may reduce documentation burden. Medical science liaisons (MSLs) face challenges documenting scientific interactions with health care professionals (HCPs). This Amgen study evaluated whether AI-enabled transcription improved MSL documentation experience and insight documentation compared with existing practice (EP) of manual customer relationship management (CRM) entry. METHODS: This randomized crossover study enrolled 27 MSLs from six Amgen Asia-Pacific affiliates; 78% used non-English languages during V2T documentation. Participants were randomized 1:1 to voice-to-text (V2T) using Microsoft Copilot then EP, or EP then V2T (Copilot), with four-week study periods. The primary outcome was composite MSL Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSLSQ) score across efficiency, speed to CRM entry, cognitive load, ease of use, and insight structuring. Secondary assessment compared blinded therapeutic area (TA) expert ratings of insight quality. Exploratory analyses assessed language effects, interaction counts, and qualitative feedback. RESULTS: All participants completed both periods. Composite MSLSQ scores were higher with V2T (Copilot) than EP (mean difference + 0.763; p = 0.0114, two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)). Domain-level primary comparisons favored V2T (Copilot) across all five MSLSQ domains, while Wilcoxon sensitivity analyses most consistently supported improvements in speed to CRM entry, cognitive load, and insight structuring. TA expert-rated insight quality and documented interaction counts were similar. Satisfaction was lower among Japanese and Korean-speaking participants owing to lower transcription accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: V2T (Copilot) improved documentation experience without improving insight quality or field activity. Limitations related to scientific terminology recognition, multilingual transcription, highlight opportunities to optimize AI-supported documentation in Medical Affairs. V2T (Copilot) improved the composite MSL-reported documentation satisfaction score, with the greatest improvements observed in cognitive load, speed to CRM entry, and insight structuring. Performance strengths included reduced documentation burden and improved structuring, while practical limitations included recognition of scientific terminology, lower transcription accuracy in Japanese and Korean, and lack of native CRM integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-026-00630-0
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating AI-Enabled Voice to Text for Medical Affairs Documentation and Insight Capture: The RAPID Randomized Crossover Trial

Riaz Abbas, Yosuke Amagai, Ka Weng Mah, Bin Li et al.
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating AI-Enabled Voice to Text for Medical Affairs Documentation and Insight Capture: The RAPID Randomized Crossover Trial

Riaz Abbas, Yosuke Amagai, Ka Weng Mah, Bin Li, Helen Lin, Jackie Tang, Jeongin Son, Marloes Oosterhof, Caidan Luo, Seigo Susa, Cheng Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) transcription systems using large language models (LLMs) and natural language processing (NLP) may reduce documentation burden. Medical science liaisons (MSLs) face challenges documenting scientific interactions with health care professionals (HCPs). This Amgen study evaluated whether AI-enabled transcription improved MSL documentation experience and insight documentation compared with existing practice (EP) of manual customer relationship management (CRM) entry. METHODS: This randomized crossover study enrolled 27 MSLs from six Amgen Asia-Pacific affiliates; 78% used non-English languages during V2T documentation. Participants were randomized 1:1 to voice-to-text (V2T) using Microsoft Copilot then EP, or EP then V2T (Copilot), with four-week study periods. The primary outcome was composite MSL Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSLSQ) score across efficiency, speed to CRM entry, cognitive load, ease of use, and insight structuring. Secondary assessment compared blinded therapeutic area (TA) expert ratings of insight quality. Exploratory analyses assessed language effects, interaction counts, and qualitative feedback. RESULTS: All participants completed both periods. Composite MSLSQ scores were higher with V2T (Copilot) than EP (mean difference + 0.763; p = 0.0114, two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)). Domain-level primary comparisons favored V2T (Copilot) across all five MSLSQ domains, while Wilcoxon sensitivity analyses most consistently supported improvements in speed to CRM entry, cognitive load, and insight structuring. TA expert-rated insight quality and documented interaction counts were similar. Satisfaction was lower among Japanese and Korean-speaking participants owing to lower transcription accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: V2T (Copilot) improved documentation experience without improving insight quality or field activity. Limitations related to scientific terminology recognition, multilingual transcription, highlight opportunities to optimize AI-supported documentation in Medical Affairs. V2T (Copilot) improved the composite MSL-reported documentation satisfaction score, with the greatest improvements observed in cognitive load, speed to CRM entry, and insight structuring. Performance strengths included reduced documentation burden and improved structuring, while practical limitations included recognition of scientific terminology, lower transcription accuracy in Japanese and Korean, and lack of native CRM integration.

Pharmaceutical Medicine
Amgen (United States) (US), Seoul Medical Center (KR), AMS (Singapore) (SG), Shanghai Medical Information Center (CN), MSD K.K. (Japan) (JP), Amgen (Australia) (AU)
Amgen
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.