The Morphology of Organizational Continuity: An Axiomatic Note on State, Relation, Transition and Time

This note proposes a compact axiomatic morphology of organizational continuity. It defines a minimal vocabulary — organization, boundary, state, relation, transition, and embedded history — and specifies conditions under which a system may remain the same organization across change. The central claim concerns organizational order rather than causal mechanism: the productive question is not only how a result appears, but when an organization has acquired the relations required for its next admissible transition. The note formulates minimal axioms, continuity properties, a non-metric entry equation, and a proposed law of organizational continuity. Its empirical commitments are bound to preregistration: boundaries, nominated dependencies, failure modes, and measurement mappings must be fixed before outcomes are known. The framework is offered as a falsifiable structural vocabulary for organizational analysis, not as a universal physical law, a specific mechanism, or an obligatory ontology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22552907
Primary Topic
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Morphology of Organizational Continuity: An Axiomatic Note on State, Relation, Transition and Time

Yury V. Shulgin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
preprint

The Morphology of Organizational Continuity: An Axiomatic Note on State, Relation, Transition and Time

Yury V. Shulgin
preprint en

Abstract

This note proposes a compact axiomatic morphology of organizational continuity. It defines a minimal vocabulary — organization, boundary, state, relation, transition, and embedded history — and specifies conditions under which a system may remain the same organization across change. The central claim concerns organizational order rather than causal mechanism: the productive question is not only how a result appears, but when an organization has acquired the relations required for its next admissible transition. The note formulates minimal axioms, continuity properties, a non-metric entry equation, and a proposed law of organizational continuity. Its empirical commitments are bound to preregistration: boundaries, nominated dependencies, failure modes, and measurement mappings must be fixed before outcomes are known. The framework is offered as a falsifiable structural vocabulary for organizational analysis, not as a universal physical law, a specific mechanism, or an obligatory ontology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Shanghai Liangyou (China) (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Chaos, Complexity, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.