Metoprolol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease without Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers may improve outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without cardiovascular disease, but randomized trials have been inconclusive. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, pragmatic, phase 4 randomized trial. Patients 40 years of age or older with COPD, sinus rhythm, and no cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive metoprolol, at a target dose of 100 mg daily, in addition to standard care or to receive standard care alone. The primary end point was the time to the first occurrence of a COPD exacerbation, cardiovascular event, or death during 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1695 patients underwent random assignment; their mean age was 70 years, and 62% were female. The primary end point occurred in 27% of patients assigned to receive metoprolol and in 30% assigned to receive standard care (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.05; P=0.14). The corresponding hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.06) for COPD exacerbations, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.11) for cardiovascular events, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.77) for death, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.28) for exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Serious adverse events occurred in 80 (9.4%) of 848 participants in the metoprolol group and 66 (7.8%) of 847 participants in the standard care group. Nonserious adverse events occurred in 293 (34.6%) of 848 patients in the metoprolol group and 247 (29.2%) of 847 in the standard care group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with COPD and no cardiovascular disease, metoprolol did not significantly improve the time to a composite of exacerbations, cardiovascular events, or death. (Funded by research grants from the Swedish Research Council and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03566667.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NEJM Evidence
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1056/evidoa2600231
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Metoprolol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease without Cardiovascular Disease

Anders Magnuson, F. Sjöberg, Beatrice Larsson, Elsa Norberg et al.
1 citations
NEJM Evidence
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
5.39
article

Metoprolol in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease without Cardiovascular Disease

Anders Magnuson, F. Sjöberg, Beatrice Larsson, Elsa Norberg, Florim Delijaj, Emily Jensen, Carolina Smith, Ole Fröbert, Marika Kvarnström, Maria Hårdstedt, Zainab Ahmadi, Kaveh Azizi, Jens Ellingsen, Mikael Hasselgren, Katarina Berndtsson Blom, Henning Stenberg, Lina Renström, Martin Lundvall, Taivo Kipper, Sara Fristorp Cesarini, Scott Montgomery, Johan SanMartin Berglund, Lowie E. G. W. Vanfleteren, Anders Blomberg, Daniel Wilhelms, Zaky Chowdhury, Andreas Palm, David Ellingsen, Christer Janson, Magnus Ekström, Josefin Sundh, Wolfgang Greger
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers may improve outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) without cardiovascular disease, but randomized trials have been inconclusive. METHODS: This was a multicenter, open-label, pragmatic, phase 4 randomized trial. Patients 40 years of age or older with COPD, sinus rhythm, and no cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive metoprolol, at a target dose of 100 mg daily, in addition to standard care or to receive standard care alone. The primary end point was the time to the first occurrence of a COPD exacerbation, cardiovascular event, or death during 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1695 patients underwent random assignment; their mean age was 70 years, and 62% were female. The primary end point occurred in 27% of patients assigned to receive metoprolol and in 30% assigned to receive standard care (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.05; P=0.14). The corresponding hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.06) for COPD exacerbations, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.11) for cardiovascular events, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.77) for death, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.28) for exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Serious adverse events occurred in 80 (9.4%) of 848 participants in the metoprolol group and 66 (7.8%) of 847 participants in the standard care group. Nonserious adverse events occurred in 293 (34.6%) of 848 patients in the metoprolol group and 247 (29.2%) of 847 in the standard care group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with COPD and no cardiovascular disease, metoprolol did not significantly improve the time to a composite of exacerbations, cardiovascular events, or death. (Funded by research grants from the Swedish Research Council and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03566667.).

NEJM Evidence
Linköping University (SE), Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), Lund University (SE), Kristianstad University (SE), Aarhus University (DK), Örebro University (SE), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Falun Hospital (SE), Karlstad Central Hospital (SE), Eastmaninstitutet (SE), Center for Clinical Research Dalarna (SE), Primary Health Care (QA), Skåne University Hospital (SE), University of Gävle (SE), Gävle Hospital (SE), Centralsjukhuset Kristianstad (SE), Linköping University Hospital (SE), Karlstad University (SE), Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Umeå University (SE), University of Borås (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
5.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.