KneeFusionNet Enables Accurate and Efficient Comprehensive Detection of Knee Ligament Injuries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Validation Study

PURPOSE: To develop and externally validate KneeFusionNet, a multimodal deep learning model for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to assess the impact of multimodal fusion and artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on diagnostic performance. METHODS: This 3-center retrospective study was conducted between April 2020 and August 2025. The injury group included patients who underwent knee MRI within 1 month before arthroscopy and had surgically confirmed ACL, PCL, MCL, or LCL injuries; controls had unremarkable MRI and physical examination findings. Two centers formed the development set, and the remaining center served as the external test set. DenseNet-based KneeFusionNet was developed and compared with 3 deep learning models. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and a reader study evaluated AI-assisted diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Overall, 919 patients were included: 759 in the development set and 160 in the external test set. Multimodal fusion outperformed single-modality approaches for all ligaments (all P < .05). On internal validation, KneeFusionNet achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.971 for ACL, 0.906 for PCL, 0.919 for MCL, and 0.924 for LCL. Corresponding external area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.888, 0.867, 0.862, and 0.874. Sex-stratified analyses showed no consistent sex-related decrease in model performance. KneeFusionNet outperformed all comparison models on internal validation (all P < .05). AI assistance improved mean diagnostic accuracy for junior surgeons from 0.818 to 0.900 and reduced mean interpretation time by 14.73 seconds across all surgeons (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: KneeFusionNet detected ACL, PCL, MCL, and LCL injuries on MRI with high diagnostic performance and outperformed comparison models. AI assistance improved diagnostic accuracy for junior surgeons and reduced interpretation time for all surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arj.70510
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

KneeFusionNet Enables Accurate and Efficient Comprehensive Detection of Knee Ligament Injuries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Validation Study

Yanguo Qin, Xianyue Shen, Shihuai Li, Deming Guo et al.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

KneeFusionNet Enables Accurate and Efficient Comprehensive Detection of Knee Ligament Injuries on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Multicenter Validation Study

Yanguo Qin, Xianyue Shen, Shihuai Li, Deming Guo, Qingshuai Wang, Xiongfeng Tang, Bo Chen, Shenghao Xu, Yingzhi Li, Yang Wu
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and externally validate KneeFusionNet, a multimodal deep learning model for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) injuries on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to assess the impact of multimodal fusion and artificial intelligence (AI) assistance on diagnostic performance. METHODS: This 3-center retrospective study was conducted between April 2020 and August 2025. The injury group included patients who underwent knee MRI within 1 month before arthroscopy and had surgically confirmed ACL, PCL, MCL, or LCL injuries; controls had unremarkable MRI and physical examination findings. Two centers formed the development set, and the remaining center served as the external test set. DenseNet-based KneeFusionNet was developed and compared with 3 deep learning models. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and a reader study evaluated AI-assisted diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Overall, 919 patients were included: 759 in the development set and 160 in the external test set. Multimodal fusion outperformed single-modality approaches for all ligaments (all P < .05). On internal validation, KneeFusionNet achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.971 for ACL, 0.906 for PCL, 0.919 for MCL, and 0.924 for LCL. Corresponding external area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.888, 0.867, 0.862, and 0.874. Sex-stratified analyses showed no consistent sex-related decrease in model performance. KneeFusionNet outperformed all comparison models on internal validation (all P < .05). AI assistance improved mean diagnostic accuracy for junior surgeons from 0.818 to 0.900 and reduced mean interpretation time by 14.73 seconds across all surgeons (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: KneeFusionNet detected ACL, PCL, MCL, and LCL injuries on MRI with high diagnostic performance and outperformed comparison models. AI assistance improved diagnostic accuracy for junior surgeons and reduced interpretation time for all surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study.

Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Jilin University (CN), Weifang People's Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University (CN), Changchun University (CN)
Jilin Scientific and Technological Development Program
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.