OpenMRF : A Modular, Vendor‐Neutral Open‐Source Framework for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Using Pulseq

ABSTRACT Purpose Widespread adoption and methodological advancement of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) are limited by the lack of unified, reproducible implementation frameworks and fragmented open‐source tools. To address these barriers, we introduce OpenMRF—a comprehensive Pulseq‐based solution—designed to enable standardized and transferable MRF research across vendors, sites, and field strengths. Methods OpenMRF integrates modular Pulseq‐based sequence design, Bloch‐equation‐based dictionary generation directly from . seq files, and iterative low‐rank subspace reconstruction. The framework was evaluated through digital phantom simulations, a multi‐site ISMRM/NIST phantom study on Siemens MRI systems at 0.55, 1.5, and 3 T, as well as GE and United Imaging 3 T platforms, and representative in vivo acquisitions in the liver (0.55 T), myocardium (1.5 T), and brain (3 T). Results Simulations demonstrated high mapping accuracy in an ISMRM/NIST‐like digital phantom, with low‐rank reconstruction yielding deviations of 0.03% ± 0.32% (T 1 ) and 0.12% ± 1.94% (T 2 ). The multi‐site phantom study yielded relaxation times consistent with reference values at all field strengths, with mean deviations of −0.1% ± 2.9% (T 1 ), −1.5% ± 8.7% (T 2 ), and −4.0% ± 7.2% (T 1ρ ). In vivo acquisitions produced high‐quality parameter maps across different anatomical applications and field strengths. Conclusion OpenMRF provides a robust, open‐source, end‐to‐end Pulseq‐based solution for MRF designed to enable reproducible sequence implementation, physics‐accurate dictionary simulation, and advanced reconstruction across vendors and field strengths. By providing a unified platform for method development, comparison, and cross‐vendor application, OpenMRF aims to accelerate reproducible and harmonized quantitative MRI research within the community.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70586
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

OpenMRF : A Modular, Vendor‐Neutral Open‐Source Framework for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Using Pulseq

Jon‐Fredrik Nielsen, Jannik Stebani, Maximilian Gram, Qingping Chen et al.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

OpenMRF : A Modular, Vendor‐Neutral Open‐Source Framework for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Using Pulseq

Jon‐Fredrik Nielsen, Jannik Stebani, Maximilian Gram, Qingping Chen, Tobias Wech, Peter Nordbeck, Nicole Seiberlich, Jesse Hamilton, Martin Blaimer, Petra Albertová, Zhibo Zhu, Sydney Janet Kaplan, Qi Liu, Tom Griesler, Ivaylo Angelov, Maxim Zaitsev, Peter Martin, Xiang Wang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Widespread adoption and methodological advancement of magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) are limited by the lack of unified, reproducible implementation frameworks and fragmented open‐source tools. To address these barriers, we introduce OpenMRF—a comprehensive Pulseq‐based solution—designed to enable standardized and transferable MRF research across vendors, sites, and field strengths. Methods OpenMRF integrates modular Pulseq‐based sequence design, Bloch‐equation‐based dictionary generation directly from . seq files, and iterative low‐rank subspace reconstruction. The framework was evaluated through digital phantom simulations, a multi‐site ISMRM/NIST phantom study on Siemens MRI systems at 0.55, 1.5, and 3 T, as well as GE and United Imaging 3 T platforms, and representative in vivo acquisitions in the liver (0.55 T), myocardium (1.5 T), and brain (3 T). Results Simulations demonstrated high mapping accuracy in an ISMRM/NIST‐like digital phantom, with low‐rank reconstruction yielding deviations of 0.03% ± 0.32% (T 1 ) and 0.12% ± 1.94% (T 2 ). The multi‐site phantom study yielded relaxation times consistent with reference values at all field strengths, with mean deviations of −0.1% ± 2.9% (T 1 ), −1.5% ± 8.7% (T 2 ), and −4.0% ± 7.2% (T 1ρ ). In vivo acquisitions produced high‐quality parameter maps across different anatomical applications and field strengths. Conclusion OpenMRF provides a robust, open‐source, end‐to‐end Pulseq‐based solution for MRF designed to enable reproducible sequence implementation, physics‐accurate dictionary simulation, and advanced reconstruction across vendors and field strengths. By providing a unified platform for method development, comparison, and cross‐vendor application, OpenMRF aims to accelerate reproducible and harmonized quantitative MRI research within the community.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
University of Freiburg (DE), University of Würzburg (DE), University of Michigan (US), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), United Imaging Healthcare (China) (CN)
European Association of National Metrology Institutes, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Siemens Healthineers, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.