Factors Associated With Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for over two decades. Adjuvant RT use in LARC represents a deviation from standard care and warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with adjuvant RT utilization. We hypothesized that sociodemographic determinants contribute to differences in the sequence of radiation treatment among patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Database (2015-2022) to identify adults with clinical stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery and RT. Patients were categorized by RT sequence (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with use of adjuvant RT. RESULTS: Of the included 48 452 patients, 6.9% received adjuvant RT. Compared with the neoadjuvant group, adjuvant RT recipients exhibited higher rates of pathologic upstaging (20.5% vs. 10.3%), positive margins (14.7% vs. 6.3%), and lymphovascular invasion (17.4% vs. 11.3%; all p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, positive margins (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.43-2.22), lymphovascular invasion (aOR 1.96, 95% CI 1.66-2.31), upstaging (aOR 1.63, 1.31-2.02) were independently associated with adjuvant RT. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT appeared to be used in patients who were found to have high-risk tumor pathology postoperatively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70365
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated With Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Aimal Khan, Hanjoo Lee, Maryam Sherwani, Alexander T. Hawkins et al.
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Factors Associated With Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Aimal Khan, Hanjoo Lee, Maryam Sherwani, Alexander T. Hawkins, Danish Ali
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) for over two decades. Adjuvant RT use in LARC represents a deviation from standard care and warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with adjuvant RT utilization. We hypothesized that sociodemographic determinants contribute to differences in the sequence of radiation treatment among patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Database (2015-2022) to identify adults with clinical stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery and RT. Patients were categorized by RT sequence (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with use of adjuvant RT. RESULTS: Of the included 48 452 patients, 6.9% received adjuvant RT. Compared with the neoadjuvant group, adjuvant RT recipients exhibited higher rates of pathologic upstaging (20.5% vs. 10.3%), positive margins (14.7% vs. 6.3%), and lymphovascular invasion (17.4% vs. 11.3%; all p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, positive margins (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.43-2.22), lymphovascular invasion (aOR 1.96, 95% CI 1.66-2.31), upstaging (aOR 1.63, 1.31-2.02) were independently associated with adjuvant RT. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant RT appeared to be used in patients who were found to have high-risk tumor pathology postoperatively.

Journal of Surgical Oncology
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.