Obtaining Scintrex CG6 Gravimeter Scale Factors with an Uncertainty Below $${1\cdot 10}^{-5}$$ in the Zugspitze Gravimeter Calibration System

Abstract Transportable spring gravimeters have many applications besides exploration geophysics and potential field determination, such as time-lapse measurements in hydrology and volcanology. For maximum accuracy, the time-dependent scale factor of each gravimeter must be determined before and after use. The required scale uncertainty depends on the target signals, the maximum gravity difference in the network, and the desired level of accuracy. In high alpine regions, large height differences can result in gravity differences of more than $$1\\cdot {10}^{6}$$ 1 · 10 6 nm/s 2 . For a target standard deviation of $$30$$ 30 nm/s 2 , the scale factor must be determined with an uncertainty below $$1\\cdot {10}^{-5}$$ 1 · 10 - 5 . The Zugspitze Calibration System, near Garmisch-Partenkirchen in the German Alps, consists of three absolute gravity (AG) stations that cover an elevation range of $$\\text{2,200}$$ 2,200 m and a gravity range of $$\\text{5,220}$$ 5,220 µm/s 2 . Due to unmodeled temporary gravity changes, primarily caused by variations in snow water equivalent and groundwater, the system has a relative stability of approximately $$5\\cdot {10}^{-5}$$ 5 · 10 - 5 . Based on 91 measurements taken over 28 months using two Scintrex CG6 spring gravimeters in this calibration system, we present two modeling approaches that attribute the observed gravity changes to either temporal variations in the instrumental scale factor or hydrological mass variations. The results demonstrate that a scale uncertainty of $$5\\cdot {10}^{-6}$$ 5 · 10 - 6 can be achieved. This study underscores the importance of determining the temporal gravity variations at each AG reference point of a calibration line when a scale uncertainty below $$1\\cdot {10}^{-5}$$ 1 · 10 - 5 is required, e.g., when using transportable spring gravimeters in high alpine regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pure and Applied Geophysics
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-026-04110-z
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Obtaining Scintrex CG6 Gravimeter Scale Factors with an Uncertainty Below $${1\cdot 10}^{-5}$$ in the Zugspitze Gravimeter Calibration System

Hartmut Wziontek, Christian Voigt, Ludger Timmen, Christian Gerlach et al.
Pure and Applied Geophysics
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Obtaining Scintrex CG6 Gravimeter Scale Factors with an Uncertainty Below $${1\cdot 10}^{-5}$$ in the Zugspitze Gravimeter Calibration System

Hartmut Wziontek, Christian Voigt, Ludger Timmen, Christian Gerlach, K. Achmüller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Transportable spring gravimeters have many applications besides exploration geophysics and potential field determination, such as time-lapse measurements in hydrology and volcanology. For maximum accuracy, the time-dependent scale factor of each gravimeter must be determined before and after use. The required scale uncertainty depends on the target signals, the maximum gravity difference in the network, and the desired level of accuracy. In high alpine regions, large height differences can result in gravity differences of more than $$1\cdot {10}^{6}$$ 1 · 10 6 nm/s 2 . For a target standard deviation of $$30$$ 30 nm/s 2 , the scale factor must be determined with an uncertainty below $$1\cdot {10}^{-5}$$ 1 · 10 - 5 . The Zugspitze Calibration System, near Garmisch-Partenkirchen in the German Alps, consists of three absolute gravity (AG) stations that cover an elevation range of $$\text{2,200}$$ 2,200 m and a gravity range of $$\text{5,220}$$ 5,220 µm/s 2 . Due to unmodeled temporary gravity changes, primarily caused by variations in snow water equivalent and groundwater, the system has a relative stability of approximately $$5\cdot {10}^{-5}$$ 5 · 10 - 5 . Based on 91 measurements taken over 28 months using two Scintrex CG6 spring gravimeters in this calibration system, we present two modeling approaches that attribute the observed gravity changes to either temporal variations in the instrumental scale factor or hydrological mass variations. The results demonstrate that a scale uncertainty of $$5\cdot {10}^{-6}$$ 5 · 10 - 6 can be achieved. This study underscores the importance of determining the temporal gravity variations at each AG reference point of a calibration line when a scale uncertainty below $$1\cdot {10}^{-5}$$ 1 · 10 - 5 is required, e.g., when using transportable spring gravimeters in high alpine regions.

Pure and Applied Geophysics
Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities (DE), Leibniz University Hannover (DE), Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Technische Universität Berlin
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.