A paradox of brokerage: alter distrust, network self-promotion, and the willingness to accept referrals from brokers

Individuals embedded in networks rich in structural holes are well positioned to broker referrals between otherwise disconnected others. Yet these hole-rich networks create a paradox: although they help brokers identify valuable opportunities, they also undermine the trust required for others to accept a referral—an action that makes recipients vulnerable to the broker's judgment and motives. We address this paradox by examining how brokers use network self-promotion, strategically highlighting their network quality and matchmaking competence, to mitigate trust deficits. Across a field study and two experiments, we show that network structure and network self-promotion jointly shape referral acceptance. Specifically, network self-promotion has asymmetric effects across the facets of trust: it substitutes for the reputational cues of a broker's ability where shared contacts cannot supply them, but amplifies the integrity-based trust that shared network ties convey where those ties are present, and does not condition the role of benevolence-based trust. By situating brokerage within the psychological literature on trust, we demonstrate how brokers' strategic impression management interacts with network structure to overcome the trust deficits inherent in networks that are rich in structural holes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2026.104523
Primary Topic
Social Power and Status Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A paradox of brokerage: alter distrust, network self-promotion, and the willingness to accept referrals from brokers

Raina A. Brands, Garrett L. Brady, Ajay Mehra
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Social Power and Status Dynamics
article

A paradox of brokerage: alter distrust, network self-promotion, and the willingness to accept referrals from brokers

Raina A. Brands, Garrett L. Brady, Ajay Mehra
article en

Abstract

Individuals embedded in networks rich in structural holes are well positioned to broker referrals between otherwise disconnected others. Yet these hole-rich networks create a paradox: although they help brokers identify valuable opportunities, they also undermine the trust required for others to accept a referral—an action that makes recipients vulnerable to the broker's judgment and motives. We address this paradox by examining how brokers use network self-promotion, strategically highlighting their network quality and matchmaking competence, to mitigate trust deficits. Across a field study and two experiments, we show that network structure and network self-promotion jointly shape referral acceptance. Specifically, network self-promotion has asymmetric effects across the facets of trust: it substitutes for the reputational cues of a broker's ability where shared contacts cannot supply them, but amplifies the integrity-based trust that shared network ties convey where those ties are present, and does not condition the role of benevolence-based trust. By situating brokerage within the psychological literature on trust, we demonstrate how brokers' strategic impression management interacts with network structure to overcome the trust deficits inherent in networks that are rich in structural holes.

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesVol. 197
University of Kentucky (US), University College London (GB), Bocconi University (IT)
London Business School, UCL Engineering, University College London
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social Power and Status Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.