Making classrooms more inclusive reduces the achievement gap in STEM: evidence from a large-scale randomized controlled trial

Students from marginalized groups tend to achieve lower grades in STEM college courses than their non-marginalized peers. We tested the effectiveness of two interventions, one aimed at changing the environment and the other aimed at changing the students. The “Inclusion intervention” helped instructors create a cooperative classroom environment where students felt interconnected and pro-inclusion social expectations were made explicit. The “Resilience intervention” consisted of well-established strategies that focus on changing the cognitions and attributions of students from marginalized groups. We compared the two interventions against a no-exposure control group in a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 60 STEM courses ( N Students = 2,116). Results show that in courses assigned to the Inclusion intervention, students from marginalized racial/ethnic groups obtained better grades – more than half a letter grade – than those in the control condition, whereas the Resilience intervention had little beneficial effect. Our research demonstrates the importance of making the classroom environment more inclusive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70718-9
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making classrooms more inclusive reduces the achievement gap in STEM: evidence from a large-scale randomized controlled trial

Markus Bräuer, Kevin R. Kennedy, Kira K. Means
Scientific Reports
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Making classrooms more inclusive reduces the achievement gap in STEM: evidence from a large-scale randomized controlled trial

Markus Bräuer, Kevin R. Kennedy, Kira K. Means
article en

Abstract

Students from marginalized groups tend to achieve lower grades in STEM college courses than their non-marginalized peers. We tested the effectiveness of two interventions, one aimed at changing the environment and the other aimed at changing the students. The “Inclusion intervention” helped instructors create a cooperative classroom environment where students felt interconnected and pro-inclusion social expectations were made explicit. The “Resilience intervention” consisted of well-established strategies that focus on changing the cognitions and attributions of students from marginalized groups. We compared the two interventions against a no-exposure control group in a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 60 STEM courses ( N Students = 2,116). Results show that in courses assigned to the Inclusion intervention, students from marginalized racial/ethnic groups obtained better grades – more than half a letter grade – than those in the control condition, whereas the Resilience intervention had little beneficial effect. Our research demonstrates the importance of making the classroom environment more inclusive.

Scientific Reports
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.