Chlorhexidine or Povidone‐Iodine for CIED Procedures? Lessons From CHLOVIS and WRAP‐IT
Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection remains one of the most consequential complications of electrophysiology practice.Even in contemporary series, a device infection may lead to prolonged hospitalization, complete system extraction, antimicrobial therapy, reimplantation, and excess mortality [ 1-3 ].Because most causative microorganisms originate from the patient's endogenous skin flora, preincisional antisepsis represents a simple and potentially modifiable component of prevention [ 1-3 ].The recently published CHLOVIS randomized trial now provides the first large CIED-specific randomized comparison of 2% alcohol-based chlorhexidine and alcohol-based povidone-iodine, and its findings can be interpreted alongside the procedural analysis from WRAP-IT [ 4-6 ].
Authors
- Silvy Laporte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-8668)
- Marouane Boukhris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-6513)
- Antoine Da Costa (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3302-9988)
- Jean Claude Deharo
- Karim Benali
Institutions
- Hôpital de la Timone (FR)
- Université Jean Monnet (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2026-09-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70422
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00