Cedulon Decision Profile: Reconciling an Agent's Decisions Against Its Effects (draft-dogru-cedulon-decision-profile-03)

Internet-Draft draft-dogru-cedulon-decision-profile-03, Cedulon Decision Profile: Reconciling an Agent's Decisions Against Its Effects, as posted to the IETF Datatracker on 6 September 2026 (submission 168695), with its XML source and the Markdown it was rendered from. The profile defines a second population on the Cedulon reconciler: a Decision Record is signed by the party that decided whether an agent may act, an Effect Extract is an authenticated list of the effects that occurred on a channel, an allow must be matched by exactly one effect whose content hash the record named, and a refusal by none. The finding this profile exists for, an effect that occurred under a reference a refusal names, is effect-against-refusal. This revision changes text only. It states one rule once, as Section 1.1, ahead of the places where it was learned: a state that exists in an implementation but never crosses the boundary to the party relying on it does not exist for that party, and a property the text does not state is a property the text does not have. The three places are named there, a second implementer's three-valued verdict that its caller still read as a boolean, two refusals the companion implementation held but never delivered, and the unordered clocks of Section 6.1 that a reader had to measure to find; Section 6.1 now points back to the rule. No rule, claim, or finding changes. Files: the plain text as posted (byte-identical to the IETF archive copy, SHA-256 62cb6081bdfaa775c86df6391d2012ab030a5b0460c4af0f8c583a980291ad71), the XML source (byte-identical to the archive copy, SHA-256 9889a2b480a54db60866407fda6ebeb491b98a76491d2e78128c6e7fa37eabf4), and the Markdown source, all from commit 6cf0384 of dogrucanemek-alt/cedulon, the commit that recorded the posted revision. This is an individual submission and a work in progress; the text calls its requirement language provisional. The external readings it records are kept, with their digests and their limits, in docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEW.md of the repository. The Internet-Draft text is subject to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (BCP 78); the repository it is taken from is licensed under Apache-2.0.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22550761
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cedulon Decision Profile: Reconciling an Agent's Decisions Against Its Effects (draft-dogru-cedulon-decision-profile-03)

Emek Can Doğru
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Cedulon Decision Profile: Reconciling an Agent's Decisions Against Its Effects (draft-dogru-cedulon-decision-profile-03)

Emek Can Doğru
article en

Abstract

Internet-Draft draft-dogru-cedulon-decision-profile-03, Cedulon Decision Profile: Reconciling an Agent's Decisions Against Its Effects, as posted to the IETF Datatracker on 6 September 2026 (submission 168695), with its XML source and the Markdown it was rendered from. The profile defines a second population on the Cedulon reconciler: a Decision Record is signed by the party that decided whether an agent may act, an Effect Extract is an authenticated list of the effects that occurred on a channel, an allow must be matched by exactly one effect whose content hash the record named, and a refusal by none. The finding this profile exists for, an effect that occurred under a reference a refusal names, is effect-against-refusal. This revision changes text only. It states one rule once, as Section 1.1, ahead of the places where it was learned: a state that exists in an implementation but never crosses the boundary to the party relying on it does not exist for that party, and a property the text does not state is a property the text does not have. The three places are named there, a second implementer's three-valued verdict that its caller still read as a boolean, two refusals the companion implementation held but never delivered, and the unordered clocks of Section 6.1 that a reader had to measure to find; Section 6.1 now points back to the rule. No rule, claim, or finding changes. Files: the plain text as posted (byte-identical to the IETF archive copy, SHA-256 62cb6081bdfaa775c86df6391d2012ab030a5b0460c4af0f8c583a980291ad71), the XML source (byte-identical to the archive copy, SHA-256 9889a2b480a54db60866407fda6ebeb491b98a76491d2e78128c6e7fa37eabf4), and the Markdown source, all from commit 6cf0384 of dogrucanemek-alt/cedulon, the commit that recorded the posted revision. This is an individual submission and a work in progress; the text calls its requirement language provisional. The external readings it records are kept, with their digests and their limits, in docs/EXTERNAL_REVIEW.md of the repository. The Internet-Draft text is subject to the IETF Trust Legal Provisions (BCP 78); the repository it is taken from is licensed under Apache-2.0.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Verax Biomedical (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.