Reading Between the Lines: A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Conversational Data Analysis

Transformer-based large language models are becoming increasingly popular in supporting qualitative analysis, but their applications and validation are often poorly characterized. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR rules to understand how such models are used in the analysis of interview and conversational data. Searches of ProQuest, Web of Science and IEEE Xplore (2020–2025) returned 3,102 records; 207 were assessed at full text, and 84 peer-reviewed studies were included. Support for thematic analysis was the most common application (43/84, 51%), typically with full transcripts analyzed using zero-shot prompting. Decoder-only models dominated (69/84, 82%), with GPT-4 (51%) and GPT-3.5 (21%) most frequent and Llama the leading open-source alternative (10%). Validation, when present, relied mainly on human-LLM comparison ( n = 33) or repeated model runs ( n = 12). Trends regarding reporting model versions and prompts were inconsistent. Standardized reporting and ethical guidance are needed to support reproducible use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261484479
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading Between the Lines: A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Conversational Data Analysis

Jieun Kim, Elliana Dunlap, Yechan Choi, Riley Wicklander et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Mental Health via Writing
article

Reading Between the Lines: A Scoping Review of Large Language Models in Conversational Data Analysis

Jieun Kim, Elliana Dunlap, Yechan Choi, Riley Wicklander, Sebastian Halicki
article en

Abstract

Transformer-based large language models are becoming increasingly popular in supporting qualitative analysis, but their applications and validation are often poorly characterized. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR rules to understand how such models are used in the analysis of interview and conversational data. Searches of ProQuest, Web of Science and IEEE Xplore (2020–2025) returned 3,102 records; 207 were assessed at full text, and 84 peer-reviewed studies were included. Support for thematic analysis was the most common application (43/84, 51%), typically with full transcripts analyzed using zero-shot prompting. Decoder-only models dominated (69/84, 82%), with GPT-4 (51%) and GPT-3.5 (21%) most frequent and Llama the leading open-source alternative (10%). Validation, when present, relied mainly on human-LLM comparison ( n = 33) or repeated model runs ( n = 12). Trends regarding reporting model versions and prompts were inconsistent. Standardized reporting and ethical guidance are needed to support reproducible use.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
University of Washington (US), Seattle University (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.