Low-Dose Naltrexone in Crohn’s Disease: A Prematurely Terminated Randomized Trial Showing Reduced Fatigue Without Clinical or Endoscopic Benefit

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is often refractory to standard therapies, and patients are sometimes reluctant to initiate immunosuppressive therapy, prompting interest in novel treatments such as low-dose naltrexone (LDN). AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of LDN for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active CD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 7 hospitals in the Netherlands. Adults with active CD (defined by mucosal ulcers on endoscopy and Simple endoscopic score for CD 3-15) were randomized 1:1 to LDN 4.5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at week 12. Secondary endpoints included clinical and endoscopic response, safety and patient-reported outcome measures. The trial was stopped early due to futility. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were randomized. After 12 weeks, endoscopic remission occurred in 1 (5.6%) vs. 3 (18.8%) patients for LDN and placebo (p=0.233), respectively. Clinical remission occurred in 22.2% (LDN) vs. 70.0% (placebo) (p=0.037). No serious adverse events were reported. For the FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire, the median difference after 12 weeks was 2.5 (IQR 0-7) for LDN vs. -3 (IQR -7-2) for placebo (p=0.012). Additionally, patient-reported outcomes showed no significant difference between LDN and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: LDN was not effective for inducing remission in CD and showed no benefit over placebo. Despite not being an effective treatment for clinical and endoscopic outcomes, it may enhance better quality of life by reducing fatigue symptoms. Future studies are needed to clarify its potential benefit on fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10234-y
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low-Dose Naltrexone in Crohn’s Disease: A Prematurely Terminated Randomized Trial Showing Reduced Fatigue Without Clinical or Endoscopic Benefit

R.L. West, A.C. De Vries, Natasja van de Pol, K. E. Verweij et al.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Low-Dose Naltrexone in Crohn’s Disease: A Prematurely Terminated Randomized Trial Showing Reduced Fatigue Without Clinical or Endoscopic Benefit

R.L. West, A.C. De Vries, Natasja van de Pol, K. E. Verweij, F. H. J. Wolfhagen, I.L. Holster, C. J. van der Woude, G. M. Fuhler, E. Paulides
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD) is often refractory to standard therapies, and patients are sometimes reluctant to initiate immunosuppressive therapy, prompting interest in novel treatments such as low-dose naltrexone (LDN). AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of LDN for induction of remission in patients with mild-to-moderate active CD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 7 hospitals in the Netherlands. Adults with active CD (defined by mucosal ulcers on endoscopy and Simple endoscopic score for CD 3-15) were randomized 1:1 to LDN 4.5 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission at week 12. Secondary endpoints included clinical and endoscopic response, safety and patient-reported outcome measures. The trial was stopped early due to futility. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were randomized. After 12 weeks, endoscopic remission occurred in 1 (5.6%) vs. 3 (18.8%) patients for LDN and placebo (p=0.233), respectively. Clinical remission occurred in 22.2% (LDN) vs. 70.0% (placebo) (p=0.037). No serious adverse events were reported. For the FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire, the median difference after 12 weeks was 2.5 (IQR 0-7) for LDN vs. -3 (IQR -7-2) for placebo (p=0.012). Additionally, patient-reported outcomes showed no significant difference between LDN and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: LDN was not effective for inducing remission in CD and showed no benefit over placebo. Despite not being an effective treatment for clinical and endoscopic outcomes, it may enhance better quality of life by reducing fatigue symptoms. Future studies are needed to clarify its potential benefit on fatigue in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL), Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis (NL), Maasstad Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
ZonMw
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.