Commercial Payors More Likely to Reimburse Unlisted Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Compared With Managed Care but With Similar Overall Dollar Amount

Purpose To compare the reimbursement practices of public managed care (MC) insurance versus private commercial insurance (COM) for hip arthroscopy using the current procedural terminology (CPT) code 29999. Methods The CPT codes and corresponding reimbursements of hip arthroscopies that employed code 29999 performed from January 2020 to December 2024 in a multihospital health system were analyzed. Patients’ insurance carriers were identified and grouped into either MC or COM. MC consisted of Medicaid and Medicare. The outcomes analyzed were as follows: whether any reimbursement was obtained, total dollar amount paid, percentage of the billing that was reimbursed, and the percentage of CPT 29999 charge that was reimbursed. Results One hundred thirty‐seven hip arthroscopies met the inclusion criteria. COM fulfilled at least part of the reimbursement (i.e., not completely deny the entire claim) in 100% of cases, whereas MC provided at least some payment in 94.1% of claims ( P = .02). However, there was no significant difference in the total dollar amount ($3191.18 vs $3563.02; P = .109) or percentage of the total charge (20.0% vs 21.7%; P = .220) reimbursed by MC relative to COM, respectively. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the percentage of CPT code 29999 reimbursed between MC and COM (25.0 vs 21.2%; P = .185). Conclusions COM was less likely to completely deny a claim relative to MC and reimbursed approximately 10% higher than MC. However, there was no significant difference between payors in the percentage of the billing that was reimbursed or the percentage of reimbursement specifically for CPT code 29999. Regardless of insurance type, there is a low percentage of reimbursement for unlisted hip arthroscopy procedures. Clinical Relevance As hip arthroscopy becomes more common, it is important to understand reimbursement patterns to ensure patients receive appropriate care and surgeons are compensated. This study provides insights that help surgeons navigate these dynamics and deliver high‐quality care, regardless of a patient's insurance provider.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70069
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commercial Payors More Likely to Reimburse Unlisted Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Compared With Managed Care but With Similar Overall Dollar Amount

Andrew Goodwillie, Matthew Zinner, Randy M. Cohn, Eric V. Neufeld et al.
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Commercial Payors More Likely to Reimburse Unlisted Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Compared With Managed Care but With Similar Overall Dollar Amount

Andrew Goodwillie, Matthew Zinner, Randy M. Cohn, Eric V. Neufeld, M Meade
article en

Abstract

Purpose To compare the reimbursement practices of public managed care (MC) insurance versus private commercial insurance (COM) for hip arthroscopy using the current procedural terminology (CPT) code 29999. Methods The CPT codes and corresponding reimbursements of hip arthroscopies that employed code 29999 performed from January 2020 to December 2024 in a multihospital health system were analyzed. Patients’ insurance carriers were identified and grouped into either MC or COM. MC consisted of Medicaid and Medicare. The outcomes analyzed were as follows: whether any reimbursement was obtained, total dollar amount paid, percentage of the billing that was reimbursed, and the percentage of CPT 29999 charge that was reimbursed. Results One hundred thirty‐seven hip arthroscopies met the inclusion criteria. COM fulfilled at least part of the reimbursement (i.e., not completely deny the entire claim) in 100% of cases, whereas MC provided at least some payment in 94.1% of claims ( P = .02). However, there was no significant difference in the total dollar amount ($3191.18 vs $3563.02; P = .109) or percentage of the total charge (20.0% vs 21.7%; P = .220) reimbursed by MC relative to COM, respectively. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the percentage of CPT code 29999 reimbursed between MC and COM (25.0 vs 21.2%; P = .185). Conclusions COM was less likely to completely deny a claim relative to MC and reimbursed approximately 10% higher than MC. However, there was no significant difference between payors in the percentage of the billing that was reimbursed or the percentage of reimbursement specifically for CPT code 29999. Regardless of insurance type, there is a low percentage of reimbursement for unlisted hip arthroscopy procedures. Clinical Relevance As hip arthroscopy becomes more common, it is important to understand reimbursement patterns to ensure patients receive appropriate care and surgeons are compensated. This study provides insights that help surgeons navigate these dynamics and deliver high‐quality care, regardless of a patient's insurance provider.

Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
Northwell Health (US), Long Island Jewish Medical Center (US), Donald & Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell (US), Valley Medical Center (US), North Shore Diabetes and Endocrine Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.