Investigative Interviewing—A Paradigm Shift in Norway?

ABSTRACT The study examined self‐reported views from 56 highly experienced Norwegian policing professionals after adoption of the KREATIV investigative interviewing model there 25 years ago. From both quantitative and qualitative questionnaire responses, participants overwhelmingly identified the primary purpose of interviews as gathering accurate and reliable information rather than obtaining confessions. The results suggest a significant cultural shift toward actively open‐minded interviewing characterised by systematic efforts to seek and test alternative explanations. However, a possible implementation gap was identified. Although officers rated KREATIV principles as highly important, they reported concerns with planning and post‐interview evaluation, contending that perceived time pressures, resource constraints, and variable leadership support inhibited full implementation of KREATIV. Notably, greater professional experience was associated with stronger endorsement of KREATIV principles but more critical self‐assessment of implementation success, suggesting a possible experience paradox. Overall, the findings indicate support for KREATIV while highlighting organisational conditions integral to sustaining rights‐based investigative interviewing.