Components and classification of frailty and palliative care

BACKGROUND: Globally, the number of people aged 65 years and older is expected to double by 2050. With increasing age, the risk of frailty and the need for palliative care also rise. A shared understanding of how to assess frailty and determine the need for palliative care could support interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice. The transition from a frail condition to palliative care is a dynamic and individualized process. Although frailty and palliative care are distinct concepts, they may overlap. The present study aimed to examine the components of frailty and palliative care in community-dwelling older people. Early recognition by healthcare professionals of the components that contribute to severe frailty can enable the timely initiation of palliative care. Our second aim was to gain insight into whether an individual should be classified as frail or in need of palliative care according to healthcare professionals. METHODS: We presented fifteen case studies to respondents who were selected based on their specific expertise in the Netherlands and Belgium. Each respondent was asked to identify, for each case study, the components that indicated frailty, palliative care needs, or both. Additionally, they were asked to rate their level of certainty regarding each indication. Wilcoxon tests were employed to assess differences, and regression analyses were conducted to identify the components most strongly associated with frailty and in need of palliative care. RESULTS: In most cases, differences were observed between the identification of frailty and palliative care needs, with par-ticipants indicating that a patient could exhibit components of frailty without necessarily having palliative care needs (p-value < 0.05). In no case were palliative components recognized with greater certainty than components of frailty. The case in our study with the highest certainty score for frailty components showed a significant difference compared to the corresponding certainty score for palliative care needs. Conversely, the case with the highest certainty score for palliative care needs did not differ significantly from the certainty score for frailty components. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that healthcare professionals use different components to classify individuals as frail or in need of palliative care. In addition, these professionals were more certain in identifying frailty than in identifying palliative care needs, and may be less likely to recognize palliative care needs in their patients, who may already be quite frail. Improved understanding of the progression from frailty to the need for palliative care may support patient-centered care and increase enhance the quality of life for individuals requiring support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Frailty & Aging
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2026.100196
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Components and classification of frailty and palliative care

Johan Wens, Tjeerd van der Ploeg, Robbert Gobbens
The Journal of Frailty & Aging
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Components and classification of frailty and palliative care

Johan Wens, Tjeerd van der Ploeg, Robbert Gobbens
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, the number of people aged 65 years and older is expected to double by 2050. With increasing age, the risk of frailty and the need for palliative care also rise. A shared understanding of how to assess frailty and determine the need for palliative care could support interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice. The transition from a frail condition to palliative care is a dynamic and individualized process. Although frailty and palliative care are distinct concepts, they may overlap. The present study aimed to examine the components of frailty and palliative care in community-dwelling older people. Early recognition by healthcare professionals of the components that contribute to severe frailty can enable the timely initiation of palliative care. Our second aim was to gain insight into whether an individual should be classified as frail or in need of palliative care according to healthcare professionals. METHODS: We presented fifteen case studies to respondents who were selected based on their specific expertise in the Netherlands and Belgium. Each respondent was asked to identify, for each case study, the components that indicated frailty, palliative care needs, or both. Additionally, they were asked to rate their level of certainty regarding each indication. Wilcoxon tests were employed to assess differences, and regression analyses were conducted to identify the components most strongly associated with frailty and in need of palliative care. RESULTS: In most cases, differences were observed between the identification of frailty and palliative care needs, with par-ticipants indicating that a patient could exhibit components of frailty without necessarily having palliative care needs (p-value < 0.05). In no case were palliative components recognized with greater certainty than components of frailty. The case in our study with the highest certainty score for frailty components showed a significant difference compared to the corresponding certainty score for palliative care needs. Conversely, the case with the highest certainty score for palliative care needs did not differ significantly from the certainty score for frailty components. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that healthcare professionals use different components to classify individuals as frail or in need of palliative care. In addition, these professionals were more certain in identifying frailty than in identifying palliative care needs, and may be less likely to recognize palliative care needs in their patients, who may already be quite frail. Improved understanding of the progression from frailty to the need for palliative care may support patient-centered care and increase enhance the quality of life for individuals requiring support.

The Journal of Frailty & AgingVol. 15(5)
University of Antwerp (BE), Inholland University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.