Assessing financial materiality for environmental issues: impacts on cost of capital in diverse national contexts

Abstract This study investigates whether corporate engagement in financially material environmental issues, as defined by SASB, reduces firms’ cost of capital (CoC) across diverse national contexts. We construct SASB-based environmental performance scores for 8314 firm-year observations from 32 countries spanning the period 2015–2022. We find that better SASB-based environmental performance is associated with a lower CoC, supporting the role of financial materiality as a credible signal to investors. Furthermore, our cross-country analysis reveals a contingency effect: in countries with high environmental performance indexes, engaging in financially material environmental issues is associated with a reduction in CoC, whereas engaging in overall environmental issues is associated with an increase. These findings provide large-scale evidence on the CoC benefits correlated with the global application of the SASB framework and offer valuable implications for corporate environmental strategies and investment decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08932-z
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Assessing financial materiality for environmental issues: impacts on cost of capital in diverse national contexts

S. Shen, Alexander Keeley, Jun Xie, Xinyu Wang et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Assessing financial materiality for environmental issues: impacts on cost of capital in diverse national contexts

S. Shen, Alexander Keeley, Jun Xie, Xinyu Wang, Shunsuke Managi, Hidemichi Fujii
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates whether corporate engagement in financially material environmental issues, as defined by SASB, reduces firms’ cost of capital (CoC) across diverse national contexts. We construct SASB-based environmental performance scores for 8314 firm-year observations from 32 countries spanning the period 2015–2022. We find that better SASB-based environmental performance is associated with a lower CoC, supporting the role of financial materiality as a credible signal to investors. Furthermore, our cross-country analysis reveals a contingency effect: in countries with high environmental performance indexes, engaging in financially material environmental issues is associated with a reduction in CoC, whereas engaging in overall environmental issues is associated with an increase. These findings provide large-scale evidence on the CoC benefits correlated with the global application of the SASB framework and offer valuable implications for corporate environmental strategies and investment decision-making.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Kyushu University (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing financial materiality for environmental issues: impacts on cost of capital in diverse national contexts — S. Shen, Alexander Keeley, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS