Recognition-Reflection Framework

The Recognition-Reflection Framework was developed during a master’s research project in special education at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in 2025. It brings selected concepts from Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition into relation with Anne-Lise Løvlie Schibbye’s relational dimensions of recognition in a conceptual matrix for structured reflection and qualitative analysis The framework was initially developed within pedagogy and special education and may also be explored in other professional and institutional contexts. Broader applications should be regarded as conceptual extensions rather than empirically validated uses. Version 3.0 expands the theoretical foundation, clarifies the conceptual combination, adds bibliographic references, and specifies the proposed scope and epistemic status of the framework. Published to establish a citable public record and contribute to ongoing scholarly dialogue and development. Part of the community: Self-Matryoshka Analytical Framework (S-MAF) and Criteriology Research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22355098
Primary Topic
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recognition-Reflection Framework

Ekaterina Eines
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
article

Recognition-Reflection Framework

Ekaterina Eines
article en

Abstract

The Recognition-Reflection Framework was developed during a master’s research project in special education at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) in 2025. It brings selected concepts from Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition into relation with Anne-Lise Løvlie Schibbye’s relational dimensions of recognition in a conceptual matrix for structured reflection and qualitative analysis The framework was initially developed within pedagogy and special education and may also be explored in other professional and institutional contexts. Broader applications should be regarded as conceptual extensions rather than empirically validated uses. Version 3.0 expands the theoretical foundation, clarifies the conceptual combination, adds bibliographic references, and specifies the proposed scope and epistemic status of the framework. Published to establish a citable public record and contribute to ongoing scholarly dialogue and development. Part of the community: Self-Matryoshka Analytical Framework (S-MAF) and Criteriology Research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovative Education and Learning Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.