Clinical Relevance of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Lipid Rafts Association and Membrane Protein Interactions in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Background: Lipid rafts or detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) have played a fundamental role during prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) activation by serving as platforms for internalization and cell signaling. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of PSMA–lipid rafts association in prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods: The study was carried out on two normal prostate (NP), 11 benign prostate hyperplastic (BPH), and 10 prostate cancer (PC) samples. Immunohistochemical analysis for PSMA, CD34, and Ki67 was performed. Serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were assayed by Immulite autoanalyzer. DRMs were isolated from LNCaP cells, NP, BPH, and PC tissues. Using Triton X-100, PSMA, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), and Flotillin-2 were analyzed in both soluble and insoluble fractions by Western blot analysis. Results: The findings demonstrate that PSMA is overexpressed in PC compared to normal and benign prostate tissues. The strongest staining of PSMA was membranous, with apical accentuation in neoplastic cells. Furthermore, upregulation of PSMA was concomitant with high expression of CD34 and Ki67 in malignant prostate. Our data indicate that PSMA, DPPIV, and BiP are distributed in the insoluble and soluble fractions of the analyzed PC samples. Nevertheless, the level of these membrane proteins is higher in the soluble fraction as compared to the DRMs in prostate adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: Overall, this preliminary study provides initial insights into the potential clinical relevance of the association between PSMA and lipid rafts in human prostatic adenocarcinoma. The observed co-distribution of PSMA with DPPIV and BiP in the DRM fractions of PC samples suggests a possible association among these membrane proteins that may contribute to PC progression. Although these findings are preliminary, they support the hypothesis that crosstalk between these proteins could occur. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to determine whether targeting PSMA and its associated membrane partners may represent a promising therapeutic strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Oncology
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2833
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Clinical Relevance of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Lipid Rafts Association and Membrane Protein Interactions in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Hassan Y. Naim, Abdullah Hoter, Ridha Oueslati, Oumaima Khelifi et al.
World Journal of Oncology
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Clinical Relevance of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen–Lipid Rafts Association and Membrane Protein Interactions in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Hassan Y. Naim, Abdullah Hoter, Ridha Oueslati, Oumaima Khelifi, Awatef Ben Jemaa, Sataa Sallami, Yassine Nouira
article en

Abstract

Background: Lipid rafts or detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) have played a fundamental role during prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) activation by serving as platforms for internalization and cell signaling. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of PSMA–lipid rafts association in prostate adenocarcinoma. Methods: The study was carried out on two normal prostate (NP), 11 benign prostate hyperplastic (BPH), and 10 prostate cancer (PC) samples. Immunohistochemical analysis for PSMA, CD34, and Ki67 was performed. Serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were assayed by Immulite autoanalyzer. DRMs were isolated from LNCaP cells, NP, BPH, and PC tissues. Using Triton X-100, PSMA, dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), binding immunoglobulin protein (BiP), and Flotillin-2 were analyzed in both soluble and insoluble fractions by Western blot analysis. Results: The findings demonstrate that PSMA is overexpressed in PC compared to normal and benign prostate tissues. The strongest staining of PSMA was membranous, with apical accentuation in neoplastic cells. Furthermore, upregulation of PSMA was concomitant with high expression of CD34 and Ki67 in malignant prostate. Our data indicate that PSMA, DPPIV, and BiP are distributed in the insoluble and soluble fractions of the analyzed PC samples. Nevertheless, the level of these membrane proteins is higher in the soluble fraction as compared to the DRMs in prostate adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: Overall, this preliminary study provides initial insights into the potential clinical relevance of the association between PSMA and lipid rafts in human prostatic adenocarcinoma. The observed co-distribution of PSMA with DPPIV and BiP in the DRM fractions of PC samples suggests a possible association among these membrane proteins that may contribute to PC progression. Although these findings are preliminary, they support the hypothesis that crosstalk between these proteins could occur. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to determine whether targeting PSMA and its associated membrane partners may represent a promising therapeutic strategy.

World Journal of OncologyVol. 17(5)
University of Carthage (TN), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE), Hôpital La Rabta (TN), Tunis El Manar University (TN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.