Perceived benefits, barriers, and health system consequences of introducing new models of online sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection testing in Ontario, Canada

Internet-based testing services for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections have increased in prevalence and altered the testing landscape and testing behaviours in many jurisdictions. Our objective was to understand how system partners perceived the possible benefits and drawbacks of adapting and implementing an online testing program like GetCheckedOnline which was already operating in British Columbia, Canada, into a new provincial context where it did not exist. We conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with sexual healthcare providers, program managers and developers, and other public health professionals with expertise in sexually transmitted infections testing ( N = 41) in Ontario, Canada. Our interview questions were part of a larger study focused on improving equitable access to sexually transmitted infections testing. Transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo software following grounded theory. We created a conceptual figure to chart tensions from participant accounts onto a model of GetCheckedOnline . We describe five key tensions in the accounts of our participants to elucidate perspectives on the possible benefits and barriers/concerns of implementing a digital testing model like GetCheckedOnline in another province: (1) access , (2) privacy , (3) co-ordination/communication , (4) agency , and (5) health system impacts . We map these five tensions across the core elements of the online testing program (i.e., from creating an online account, completing an assessment, and submitting specimens to getting results and engaging in repeat testing). Our analysis elucidates the multiple advantages that online testing modalities may provide for service users as well as substantive barriers and concerns perceived by health system partners, including the potential (unintended) consequences and paradoxes of introducing digital sexually transmitted infections testing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15501-2
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived benefits, barriers, and health system consequences of introducing new models of online sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection testing in Ontario, Canada

Heeho Ryu, Mackenzie Stewart, Daniel Grace, Mark Gilbert et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Perceived benefits, barriers, and health system consequences of introducing new models of online sexually transmitted and blood-borne infection testing in Ontario, Canada

Heeho Ryu, Mackenzie Stewart, Daniel Grace, Mark Gilbert, Joshun Dulai, Catherine Worthington
article en

Abstract

Internet-based testing services for sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections have increased in prevalence and altered the testing landscape and testing behaviours in many jurisdictions. Our objective was to understand how system partners perceived the possible benefits and drawbacks of adapting and implementing an online testing program like GetCheckedOnline which was already operating in British Columbia, Canada, into a new provincial context where it did not exist. We conducted in-depth interviews and focus groups with sexual healthcare providers, program managers and developers, and other public health professionals with expertise in sexually transmitted infections testing ( N = 41) in Ontario, Canada. Our interview questions were part of a larger study focused on improving equitable access to sexually transmitted infections testing. Transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analysed using NVivo software following grounded theory. We created a conceptual figure to chart tensions from participant accounts onto a model of GetCheckedOnline . We describe five key tensions in the accounts of our participants to elucidate perspectives on the possible benefits and barriers/concerns of implementing a digital testing model like GetCheckedOnline in another province: (1) access , (2) privacy , (3) co-ordination/communication , (4) agency , and (5) health system impacts . We map these five tensions across the core elements of the online testing program (i.e., from creating an online account, completing an assessment, and submitting specimens to getting results and engaging in repeat testing). Our analysis elucidates the multiple advantages that online testing modalities may provide for service users as well as substantive barriers and concerns perceived by health system partners, including the potential (unintended) consequences and paradoxes of introducing digital sexually transmitted infections testing.

BMC Health Services Research
University of Toronto (CA), University of Victoria (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.