IMPACT OF PHARMACIST-LED MEDICATION RECONCILIATION ON MEDICATION DISCREPANCIES AND PATIENT SAFETY DURING TRANSITIONS OF CARE: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE SYNTHESIS

Medication discrepancies are common during admission, transfer, and discharge. Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians can obtain best possible medication histories, identify discrepancies, communicate corrections, counsel patients, and support post-discharge continuity. To synthesize contemporary international and Saudi evidence on the effectiveness of pharmacist- or pharmacy-led medication reconciliation for reducing medication discrepancies, clinically important medication errors, and subsequent healthcare utilization during transitions of care. An updated PRISMA 2020-aligned systematic-review draft was developed from PubMed-indexed and publisher-verified reports available through 29 August 2026. Comparative and implementation studies involving adult transitions of care and pharmacist/pharmacy-team medication reconciliation were mapped. Outcomes, settings, sample sizes, effects, and limitations were extracted. Because outcome definitions, intervention components, transition points, and effect measures were heterogeneous, estimates were synthesized narratively and displayed descriptively without a new pooled meta-analysis. Twelve core reports were included in the current evidence map, five from Saudi Arabia. A prior meta-analysis of 19 studies found fewer patients with discrepancies after single-transition interventions (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.23–0.50), but not conclusively after multiple-transition interventions (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77–1.02). Saudi studies consistently identified high discrepancy burdens, with 42.4%–48.3% of selected admissions having at least one unintended discrepancy. A 2024 pragmatic controlled trial reported clinically important discharge errors in 9.3% versus 61.9%, but no improvement in 30-day utilization. Across studies, evidence was stronger for medication-process outcomes than for readmission or emergency utilization. Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation improves detection and reduction of medication discrepancies, particularly at a clearly defined admission or discharge transition. Evidence that reconciliation alone reduces readmission or emergency utilization remains inconsistent. Saudi multicenter trials should integrate medication reconciliation with discharge counseling, communication, follow-up, and risk stratification while measuring patient-level harm and utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22346168
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPACT OF PHARMACIST-LED MEDICATION RECONCILIATION ON MEDICATION DISCREPANCIES AND PATIENT SAFETY DURING TRANSITIONS OF CARE: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE SYNTHESIS

Ahmed Alanazi, Saad khalaf alshammari, Mohammed Khalid Alrabiah, Abdullah Salman Mohammed Matar et al.
Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

IMPACT OF PHARMACIST-LED MEDICATION RECONCILIATION ON MEDICATION DISCREPANCIES AND PATIENT SAFETY DURING TRANSITIONS OF CARE: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE SYNTHESIS

Ahmed Alanazi, Saad khalaf alshammari, Mohammed Khalid Alrabiah, Abdullah Salman Mohammed Matar, Ahmad Fahad Ghalib Alotaibi, Omar Shaffay Alenzy, Mishal Khaled Alotaibi, Abdulaziz Abdullah S. Alotaibi
article en

Abstract

Medication discrepancies are common during admission, transfer, and discharge. Pharmacists and pharmacy technicians can obtain best possible medication histories, identify discrepancies, communicate corrections, counsel patients, and support post-discharge continuity. To synthesize contemporary international and Saudi evidence on the effectiveness of pharmacist- or pharmacy-led medication reconciliation for reducing medication discrepancies, clinically important medication errors, and subsequent healthcare utilization during transitions of care. An updated PRISMA 2020-aligned systematic-review draft was developed from PubMed-indexed and publisher-verified reports available through 29 August 2026. Comparative and implementation studies involving adult transitions of care and pharmacist/pharmacy-team medication reconciliation were mapped. Outcomes, settings, sample sizes, effects, and limitations were extracted. Because outcome definitions, intervention components, transition points, and effect measures were heterogeneous, estimates were synthesized narratively and displayed descriptively without a new pooled meta-analysis. Twelve core reports were included in the current evidence map, five from Saudi Arabia. A prior meta-analysis of 19 studies found fewer patients with discrepancies after single-transition interventions (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.23–0.50), but not conclusively after multiple-transition interventions (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77–1.02). Saudi studies consistently identified high discrepancy burdens, with 42.4%–48.3% of selected admissions having at least one unintended discrepancy. A 2024 pragmatic controlled trial reported clinically important discharge errors in 9.3% versus 61.9%, but no improvement in 30-day utilization. Across studies, evidence was stronger for medication-process outcomes than for readmission or emergency utilization. Pharmacist-led medication reconciliation improves detection and reduction of medication discrepancies, particularly at a clearly defined admission or discharge transition. Evidence that reconciliation alone reduces readmission or emergency utilization remains inconsistent. Saudi multicenter trials should integrate medication reconciliation with discharge counseling, communication, follow-up, and risk stratification while measuring patient-level harm and utilization.

Research
King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.