Prediction of Residual Disease in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for unresectable head and neck cancer (HNC) in advanced stages is associated with a high probability of residual disease (RD). Salvage surgery after completing CCRT often leads to severe complications, and palliative care is required if surgery is not feasible. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for RD based on pretreatment clinical features. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed the medical records of patients with unresectable HNC who received CCRT at the Radiation Oncology Unit of Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Thailand, between October 2019 and October 2025. Clinical features and laboratory results were collected before treatment. Tumor response was evaluated 8–12 weeks after completion of CCRT using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of RD. The model performance was evaluated for discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) and for calibration using calibration plots. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap resampling method. Decision curve analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 382 patients with HNC were included. After the completion of CCRT, 180 patients (47.1%) presented with RD. The final model retained primary tumor site (hypopharynx (odds ratio (OR): 3.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–11.40) and oral cavity (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 0.95–14.90)), maximum tumor diameter (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.59–4.39), time to initiation of radiotherapy (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02), body mass index (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.88–1.06), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.94–1.10), and hemoglobin level (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.79–1.11). The model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an AuROC of 0.929 (95% CI: 0.903–0.954). At an RD probability cutoff of ≥ 47.1%, the model yielded a positive predictive value of 81.2% (95% CI: 75.1–86.4) and a negative predictive value of 89.2% (95% CI: 83.8–93.3). Conclusions: This clinical feature-based prediction model accurately predicted the probability of RD in patients with unresectable HNC. Physicians can utilize this model for pre-CCRT treatment planning to identify high-risk patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Oncology
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2821
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Residual Disease in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Thanin Lokeskrawee, Suwapim Chanlaor, Peeraphong Thiarawat, Jayanton Patumanond et al.
World Journal of Oncology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Prediction of Residual Disease in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Thanin Lokeskrawee, Suwapim Chanlaor, Peeraphong Thiarawat, Jayanton Patumanond, Suppachai Lawanaskol, Wanwisa Bumrungpagdee, Chawalit Lakdee, Piradee Chinati
article en

Abstract

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for unresectable head and neck cancer (HNC) in advanced stages is associated with a high probability of residual disease (RD). Salvage surgery after completing CCRT often leads to severe complications, and palliative care is required if surgery is not feasible. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for RD based on pretreatment clinical features. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed the medical records of patients with unresectable HNC who received CCRT at the Radiation Oncology Unit of Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Thailand, between October 2019 and October 2025. Clinical features and laboratory results were collected before treatment. Tumor response was evaluated 8–12 weeks after completion of CCRT using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of RD. The model performance was evaluated for discrimination using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) and for calibration using calibration plots. Internal validation was performed using the bootstrap resampling method. Decision curve analysis was also performed. Results: A total of 382 patients with HNC were included. After the completion of CCRT, 180 patients (47.1%) presented with RD. The final model retained primary tumor site (hypopharynx (odds ratio (OR): 3.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10–11.40) and oral cavity (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: 0.95–14.90)), maximum tumor diameter (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.59–4.39), time to initiation of radiotherapy (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00–1.02), body mass index (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.88–1.06), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.94–1.10), and hemoglobin level (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.79–1.11). The model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an AuROC of 0.929 (95% CI: 0.903–0.954). At an RD probability cutoff of ≥ 47.1%, the model yielded a positive predictive value of 81.2% (95% CI: 75.1–86.4) and a negative predictive value of 89.2% (95% CI: 83.8–93.3). Conclusions: This clinical feature-based prediction model accurately predicted the probability of RD in patients with unresectable HNC. Physicians can utilize this model for pre-CCRT treatment planning to identify high-risk patients.

World Journal of OncologyVol. 17(5)
Chaiyaphum Rajabhat University (TH), Buddhachinaraj Hospital (TH), Lampang Hospital (TH), Naresuan University (TH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.