Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria, Clinical Symptoms, and Risk Factors for Visual Fatigue: A Modified Delphi Study

INTRODUCTION: Visual fatigue is becoming increasingly prevalent globally, while universally accepted definitions and standardized diagnostic criteria remain lacking. This study aims to develop consensus-based recommendations on the definition, diagnostic criteria, core symptoms, risk factors, and assessment of visual fatigue, using a modified Delphi process to support standardized clinical and epidemiologic practice. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was conducted with an international panel of experts in optometry, ophthalmology, and related disciplines. Two rounds of questionnaires were used to generate candidate definitions, diagnostic criteria, symptoms, risk factors, assessment methods and management principles. A subsequent hybrid meeting was held to discuss unresolved items and consolidate the final recommendations. RESULTS: Of 20 experts invited, 14 participated in the panel (response rate 70%); 13 (92.8%) completed the round-2 questionnaire and 12 (85.7%) took part in the hybrid discussion. The final consensus comprised three major recommendations with 13 constituent items. Recommendation 1 defines visual fatigue as a functional disease characterized by a core symptom set and functional impact and emphasizes identification of common associated conditions. Recommendation 2 specifies a structured assessment pathway including essential clinical examinations for confirming visual fatigue and ruling out comorbidities, and the use of questionnaires and objective assessments where available. Recommendation 3 focuses on prioritizing high-risk populations, targeting modifiable risk factors, and principles for management and outcomes to track in future work. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides a foundational framework for addressing the growing global burden of visual fatigue by defining it as a distinct functional disease and providing a structured diagnostic framework and a stepwise management approach. It offers a foundation for the global standard of care for visual fatigue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-026-01491-1
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria, Clinical Symptoms, and Risk Factors for Visual Fatigue: A Modified Delphi Study

Mingguang He, Xia Gong, Ching Yi Wu, Nathan Congdon et al.
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Consensus on Diagnostic Criteria, Clinical Symptoms, and Risk Factors for Visual Fatigue: A Modified Delphi Study

Mingguang He, Xia Gong, Ching Yi Wu, Nathan Congdon, Fan Song, Yanxian Chen, Lingyi Liang, Lei Zhou, Kyoung Yul Seo, Alvin Young, Kazuo Tsubota, Chea-su Kee, Ying Jie, Louis Tong, Yuichi Hori, Zuguo Liu
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Visual fatigue is becoming increasingly prevalent globally, while universally accepted definitions and standardized diagnostic criteria remain lacking. This study aims to develop consensus-based recommendations on the definition, diagnostic criteria, core symptoms, risk factors, and assessment of visual fatigue, using a modified Delphi process to support standardized clinical and epidemiologic practice. METHODS: A modified Delphi process was conducted with an international panel of experts in optometry, ophthalmology, and related disciplines. Two rounds of questionnaires were used to generate candidate definitions, diagnostic criteria, symptoms, risk factors, assessment methods and management principles. A subsequent hybrid meeting was held to discuss unresolved items and consolidate the final recommendations. RESULTS: Of 20 experts invited, 14 participated in the panel (response rate 70%); 13 (92.8%) completed the round-2 questionnaire and 12 (85.7%) took part in the hybrid discussion. The final consensus comprised three major recommendations with 13 constituent items. Recommendation 1 defines visual fatigue as a functional disease characterized by a core symptom set and functional impact and emphasizes identification of common associated conditions. Recommendation 2 specifies a structured assessment pathway including essential clinical examinations for confirming visual fatigue and ruling out comorbidities, and the use of questionnaires and objective assessments where available. Recommendation 3 focuses on prioritizing high-risk populations, targeting modifiable risk factors, and principles for management and outcomes to track in future work. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides a foundational framework for addressing the growing global burden of visual fatigue by defining it as a distinct functional disease and providing a structured diagnostic framework and a stepwise management approach. It offers a foundation for the global standard of care for visual fatigue.

Ophthalmology and Therapy
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN), Toho University (JP), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), The University of Melbourne (AU), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Xiamen University (CN), Yonsei University (KR), Singapore National Eye Center (SG), Hong Kong Eye Hospital (CN), Australian College of Optometry (AU), Keio University Hospital (JP), Prince of Wales Hospital (CN), Singapore Eye Research Institute (SG)
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale, Australian Research Council, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.