Who (or What) Is a Teammate? A Conceptual Foundation for Human-Technology Teaming

As technology is increasingly integrated into teamwork, it is important to consider how and when human and non-human entities may function as teammates and the conditions under which they may be regarded as such. Drawing on cross-disciplinary literature, we advance a comprehensive conceptualization of “teammate,” which suggests that teammates take many forms, operate within various contexts, and are perceived as teammates. From this definition, we outline a set of guiding questions to consider before viewing technology as teammates with case examples to illustrate how one might use these questions in practice. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964261478624
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who (or What) Is a Teammate? A Conceptual Foundation for Human-Technology Teaming

Allison Traylor, Marissa L. Shuffler, Alexandria N. Wentworth, Elizabeth A. Bell et al.
Small Group Research
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Who (or What) Is a Teammate? A Conceptual Foundation for Human-Technology Teaming

Allison Traylor, Marissa L. Shuffler, Alexandria N. Wentworth, Elizabeth A. Bell, Marlee J. Moore, Eduardo Salas
article en

Abstract

As technology is increasingly integrated into teamwork, it is important to consider how and when human and non-human entities may function as teammates and the conditions under which they may be regarded as such. Drawing on cross-disciplinary literature, we advance a comprehensive conceptualization of “teammate,” which suggests that teammates take many forms, operate within various contexts, and are perceived as teammates. From this definition, we outline a set of guiding questions to consider before viewing technology as teammates with case examples to illustrate how one might use these questions in practice. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

Small Group Research
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Rice University (US), Clemson University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.