Prefiguration and the independent living movement

This article facilitates a productive encounter between social movement studies and the Independent Living Movement (ILM), a collective mobilisation that advances disabled people’s self-determination. More specifically, we analyse the ILM from the perspective of prefiguration, understood as the activist practice of collectively realising a desired future in the present. This helps illuminate pivotal aspects of the ILM that remain hidden in more instrumental or policy-oriented accounts of the movement. Such aspects include, for example, ILM’s bold experimentation and its important work on generating, exchanging, and preserving organic knowledge through self-education and norming. The first part of the article introduces the ILM and the concept of prefiguration. We then apply this framework to archival accounts detailing the activities of the first Centre for Independent Living (CIL) in the world – CIL Berkeley – in the 1970s. In the second part of the article, we shift our attention to the present by exploring attitudes to prefiguration displayed by young disabled activists in Europe in a recent research project. We conclude with some conceptual remarks about prefigurative research, complemented by a practice-oriented call to strengthen the prefigurative dimension of the ILM as a prerequisite for its more strategic, longer-term, and policy-oriented aspirations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social movement studies
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2026.2728589
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prefiguration and the independent living movement

Miro Griffiths, Teodor Mladenov
Social movement studies
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Prefiguration and the independent living movement

Miro Griffiths, Teodor Mladenov
article en

Abstract

This article facilitates a productive encounter between social movement studies and the Independent Living Movement (ILM), a collective mobilisation that advances disabled people’s self-determination. More specifically, we analyse the ILM from the perspective of prefiguration, understood as the activist practice of collectively realising a desired future in the present. This helps illuminate pivotal aspects of the ILM that remain hidden in more instrumental or policy-oriented accounts of the movement. Such aspects include, for example, ILM’s bold experimentation and its important work on generating, exchanging, and preserving organic knowledge through self-education and norming. The first part of the article introduces the ILM and the concept of prefiguration. We then apply this framework to archival accounts detailing the activities of the first Centre for Independent Living (CIL) in the world – CIL Berkeley – in the 1970s. In the second part of the article, we shift our attention to the present by exploring attitudes to prefiguration displayed by young disabled activists in Europe in a recent research project. We conclude with some conceptual remarks about prefigurative research, complemented by a practice-oriented call to strengthen the prefigurative dimension of the ILM as a prerequisite for its more strategic, longer-term, and policy-oriented aspirations.

Social movement studies
University of Leeds (GB), University of Dundee (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.