Video‐Assisted Versus Conventional Surgical Informed Consent in Visceral Surgery—A Cluster Quasi‐Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive informed consent is a core surgical responsibility but is increasingly challenged by rising patient volumes and limited personnel resources. Digital solutions in healthcare offer opportunities to optimize patient education. Video-assisted informed consent may reduce time expenditure without compromising informational quality. The objective was to compare video-assisted with conventional informed consent regarding duration, patient understanding, patient, and physician satisfaction. METHODS: In this prospective, cluster quasi-randomized clinical trial at the University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany (September 2023-March 2025), 153 of 330 screened patients scheduled for elective cholecystectomy or colon resection were enrolled. The intervention group received a video developed by medudoc education GmbH, while the control group received physician-led informed consent according to the hospital's standard. Consultation duration was recorded using a stopwatch. Patients completed questionnaires on satisfaction and understanding immediately after consent and postoperatively, physicians rated satisfaction at study completion. The primary outcome was time reduction for the physician consultation time. Secondary outcomes included patient understanding, patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, and postoperative pain. RESULTS: Of 153 participants, 84 (55%) received video-assisted and 69 (45%) conventional consent. Median physician consultation time was significantly reduced with video assistance for cholecystectomy (1.5 vs. 8.1 min) and colon resection (3.3 vs. 11.9 min). Patient understanding, satisfaction, and postoperative pain outcomes were high in both groups. Physician satisfaction with the video-assisted process was consistently high. CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted surgical informed consent serves as a valuable adjunct in preoperative patient education and represents a promising approach to digital innovation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN26680260 (https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=ISRCTN26680260).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70561
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Video‐Assisted Versus Conventional Surgical Informed Consent in Visceral Surgery—A Cluster Quasi‐Randomized Clinical Trial

Johan Friso Lock, Leon Schuetze, Johanna Wagner, Christoph‐Thomas Germer et al.
World Journal of Surgery
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Video‐Assisted Versus Conventional Surgical Informed Consent in Visceral Surgery—A Cluster Quasi‐Randomized Clinical Trial

Johan Friso Lock, Leon Schuetze, Johanna Wagner, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Svenja G. P. D. Leicht
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive informed consent is a core surgical responsibility but is increasingly challenged by rising patient volumes and limited personnel resources. Digital solutions in healthcare offer opportunities to optimize patient education. Video-assisted informed consent may reduce time expenditure without compromising informational quality. The objective was to compare video-assisted with conventional informed consent regarding duration, patient understanding, patient, and physician satisfaction. METHODS: In this prospective, cluster quasi-randomized clinical trial at the University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany (September 2023-March 2025), 153 of 330 screened patients scheduled for elective cholecystectomy or colon resection were enrolled. The intervention group received a video developed by medudoc education GmbH, while the control group received physician-led informed consent according to the hospital's standard. Consultation duration was recorded using a stopwatch. Patients completed questionnaires on satisfaction and understanding immediately after consent and postoperatively, physicians rated satisfaction at study completion. The primary outcome was time reduction for the physician consultation time. Secondary outcomes included patient understanding, patient satisfaction, physician satisfaction, and postoperative pain. RESULTS: Of 153 participants, 84 (55%) received video-assisted and 69 (45%) conventional consent. Median physician consultation time was significantly reduced with video assistance for cholecystectomy (1.5 vs. 8.1 min) and colon resection (3.3 vs. 11.9 min). Patient understanding, satisfaction, and postoperative pain outcomes were high in both groups. Physician satisfaction with the video-assisted process was consistently high. CONCLUSIONS: Video-assisted surgical informed consent serves as a valuable adjunct in preoperative patient education and represents a promising approach to digital innovation in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN26680260 (https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=ISRCTN26680260).

World Journal of Surgery
University of Würzburg (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.