TabPFN-based explainable machine learning for predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is common in early neonatal life, and delayed recognition of high-risk infants may result in bilirubin-induced neurological injury. Prediction models based on routinely available maternal, perinatal, neonatal, and standardized laboratory variables may support early risk stratification as an adjunct to bilirubin measurement and clinical assessment. This single-center retrospective cohort included 986 neonates admitted between January 1, 2016, and March 1, 2026. The hemolytic-disease variable was excluded before preprocessing and model fitting. Admissions from 2016 through 2023 formed the development cohort (n = 776), and those from 2024 through 2026 formed a held-out temporal validation cohort (n = 210). Stability was assessed using repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation repeated 5 times. The primary outcome was peak total bilirubin of at least 230 µmol/L during hospitalization. Only predictors documented by the predefined early-admission prediction time were used. Tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN) was compared with 5 conventional machine learning models. Performance included discrimination, calibration, Brier score, decision-curve analysis, bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs), and grouped permutation importance. The development and temporal validation cohorts included 468 and 54 events, respectively. Across 25 held-out development folds, TabPFN achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.997 (standard deviation [SD], 0.002), mean area under the precision-recall curve of 0.998 (SD, 0.001), and mean Brier score of 0.023 (SD, 0.009). In temporal validation, TabPFN achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.999 (95% CI, 0.997–1.000), area under the precision-recall curve of 0.997 (95% CI, 0.991–1.000), and Brier score of 0.013. At the development-derived threshold of 0.538, sensitivity was 1.000, specificity 0.981, positive predictive value 0.947, negative predictive value 1.000, and F1 score 0.973. Random forest had marginally higher temporal discrimination, whereas TabPFN had the lowest Brier score. Leading predictors were maternal disease count, abortion or preterm history, postnatal abnormality, and birth-weight category. After exclusion of the hemolytic-disease variable, TabPFN showed stable repeated-cross-validation performance and strong temporal discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit. These single-center findings support TabPFN as a candidate decision-support approach requiring independent multicenter validation and prospective benchmarking against standard-of-care bilirubin risk assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050472
Primary Topic
Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TabPFN-based explainable machine learning for predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Yu Zhang, Hui Wang, Liping Zhang
Medicine
Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
article

TabPFN-based explainable machine learning for predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Yu Zhang, Hui Wang, Liping Zhang
article en

Abstract

Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is common in early neonatal life, and delayed recognition of high-risk infants may result in bilirubin-induced neurological injury. Prediction models based on routinely available maternal, perinatal, neonatal, and standardized laboratory variables may support early risk stratification as an adjunct to bilirubin measurement and clinical assessment. This single-center retrospective cohort included 986 neonates admitted between January 1, 2016, and March 1, 2026. The hemolytic-disease variable was excluded before preprocessing and model fitting. Admissions from 2016 through 2023 formed the development cohort (n = 776), and those from 2024 through 2026 formed a held-out temporal validation cohort (n = 210). Stability was assessed using repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation repeated 5 times. The primary outcome was peak total bilirubin of at least 230 µmol/L during hospitalization. Only predictors documented by the predefined early-admission prediction time were used. Tabular prior-data fitted network (TabPFN) was compared with 5 conventional machine learning models. Performance included discrimination, calibration, Brier score, decision-curve analysis, bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs), and grouped permutation importance. The development and temporal validation cohorts included 468 and 54 events, respectively. Across 25 held-out development folds, TabPFN achieved a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.997 (standard deviation [SD], 0.002), mean area under the precision-recall curve of 0.998 (SD, 0.001), and mean Brier score of 0.023 (SD, 0.009). In temporal validation, TabPFN achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.999 (95% CI, 0.997–1.000), area under the precision-recall curve of 0.997 (95% CI, 0.991–1.000), and Brier score of 0.013. At the development-derived threshold of 0.538, sensitivity was 1.000, specificity 0.981, positive predictive value 0.947, negative predictive value 1.000, and F1 score 0.973. Random forest had marginally higher temporal discrimination, whereas TabPFN had the lowest Brier score. Leading predictors were maternal disease count, abortion or preterm history, postnatal abnormality, and birth-weight category. After exclusion of the hemolytic-disease variable, TabPFN showed stable repeated-cross-validation performance and strong temporal discrimination, calibration, and clinical net benefit. These single-center findings support TabPFN as a candidate decision-support approach requiring independent multicenter validation and prospective benchmarking against standard-of-care bilirubin risk assessment.

MedicineVol. 105(36)
Third People's Hospital of Chengdu (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neonatal Health and Biochemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.