Framing the Canadian Health Technology Assessment as an Organisational Process: A Bibliometric Analysis

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is an organizational process used to determine the value of health-technologies. There is considerable variation in how HTA is developed globally, with Canada at the forefront of this field, having pioneered the use of HTA and implemented it extensively across healthcare organisations at all levels. This study is relevant for its unique focus on citation networks and author keywords regarding HTA in Canada, providing a holistic view by analysing HTA as an organizational process. By identifying fundamental process elements and differentiating research streams (RSs), it addresses a notable gap in the literature, offering fresh insights and informing policy recommendations to enhance HTA practices. While referring to the Canadian HTA, this study conducts a Systematic Literature Network Analysis to identify the RSs that will be analysed according to a process perspective. This analysis allows highlighting the process components-like stakeholders, phases, and methods-that have played a role in the success of Canada's HTA, as well as pinpointing the ongoing challenges that need to be tackled to create greater value. Analysing documents published in peer-reviewed English-language journals from the Scopus-Elsevier database, we identified seven RSs, including macro-HTA, meso-HTA, micro-HTA, ethical considerations, and patient involvement. For each stream, this study delineates the process elements, that is, the involved stakeholders, process phases, methodologies, and evaluation criteria. It is evident that while expert panels and specialist groups are crucial for technical HTA activities, patients and caregivers play a pivotal role in social and ethical evaluations. The study also highlights future challenges for HTA procedures: integrating qualitative and quantitative considerations, assessing the real impact of macro-HTA outputs, and overcoming barriers to patient involvement. Theoretically, this paper clarifies the differences between streams in terms of HTA process elements, and practically, it assists practitioners in tailoring the HTA process to their specific needs. Policymaking recommendations include considerations regarding the number and intensity of stakeholder engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70132
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing the Canadian Health Technology Assessment as an Organisational Process: A Bibliometric Analysis

Salvatore Tallarico, Simone Lazzini, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Luisa Pellegrini
The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Framing the Canadian Health Technology Assessment as an Organisational Process: A Bibliometric Analysis

Salvatore Tallarico, Simone Lazzini, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Luisa Pellegrini
article en

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is an organizational process used to determine the value of health-technologies. There is considerable variation in how HTA is developed globally, with Canada at the forefront of this field, having pioneered the use of HTA and implemented it extensively across healthcare organisations at all levels. This study is relevant for its unique focus on citation networks and author keywords regarding HTA in Canada, providing a holistic view by analysing HTA as an organizational process. By identifying fundamental process elements and differentiating research streams (RSs), it addresses a notable gap in the literature, offering fresh insights and informing policy recommendations to enhance HTA practices. While referring to the Canadian HTA, this study conducts a Systematic Literature Network Analysis to identify the RSs that will be analysed according to a process perspective. This analysis allows highlighting the process components-like stakeholders, phases, and methods-that have played a role in the success of Canada's HTA, as well as pinpointing the ongoing challenges that need to be tackled to create greater value. Analysing documents published in peer-reviewed English-language journals from the Scopus-Elsevier database, we identified seven RSs, including macro-HTA, meso-HTA, micro-HTA, ethical considerations, and patient involvement. For each stream, this study delineates the process elements, that is, the involved stakeholders, process phases, methodologies, and evaluation criteria. It is evident that while expert panels and specialist groups are crucial for technical HTA activities, patients and caregivers play a pivotal role in social and ethical evaluations. The study also highlights future challenges for HTA procedures: integrating qualitative and quantitative considerations, assessing the real impact of macro-HTA outputs, and overcoming barriers to patient involvement. Theoretically, this paper clarifies the differences between streams in terms of HTA process elements, and practically, it assists practitioners in tailoring the HTA process to their specific needs. Policymaking recommendations include considerations regarding the number and intensity of stakeholder engagement.

The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
University of Pisa (IT), University of Toronto (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.