Combined prognostic value of age at onset and socioeconomic status for long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer

We investigated the combined long-term prognostic value of age at onset and socioeconomic status (SES) on breast cancer overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in a cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Age at onset was defined as the age at primary diagnosis, with a 40-year cutoff to distinguish early- and late-onset. We estimated individual SES from patients’ reported household income, occupational categories, and education levels. We estimated Kaplan‒Meier survival curves and performed regression analyses using the Cox model, including an interaction term of age at onset and SES. In 109 women included in the study, those with early-onset breast cancer had a non-significantly higher mortality rate than those with late-onset breast cancer (rate difference 0.03/PY). The hazard of metastasis was significantly lower for the medium SES (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19–0.69) and the high SES (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.63) than for the low SES group. Compared to late-onset, early-onset cases had no difference in OS or MFS within the first 10 and 2 years following primary diagnosis, respectively. However, early-onset cases had a worse prognosis thereafter. Similarly, high SES was associated with better survival but only after 7.5 and 3 years following primary diagnosis for OS and MFS, respectively. We found a significant effect modification: higher SES mitigates the effect of early-onset status while it offered minimal survival benefit when age at onset was over 65 years. The combination of age at onset and SES may provide long-term prognostic information. As breast cancer survival has improved in recent decades, addressing SES-related social determinants in clinical settings has become increasingly important for optimizing long-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-69757-z
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined prognostic value of age at onset and socioeconomic status for long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer

Christine Bobin‐Dubigeon, Caroline Goupille, Eva Gorrochategui, Germán Cano-Sancho et al.
Scientific Reports
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Combined prognostic value of age at onset and socioeconomic status for long-term survival in metastatic breast cancer

Christine Bobin‐Dubigeon, Caroline Goupille, Eva Gorrochategui, Germán Cano-Sancho, Jean‐Sébastien Frenel, Vincent Bessonneau, Ke Zhou, M. Bellanger
article en

Abstract

We investigated the combined long-term prognostic value of age at onset and socioeconomic status (SES) on breast cancer overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in a cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Age at onset was defined as the age at primary diagnosis, with a 40-year cutoff to distinguish early- and late-onset. We estimated individual SES from patients’ reported household income, occupational categories, and education levels. We estimated Kaplan‒Meier survival curves and performed regression analyses using the Cox model, including an interaction term of age at onset and SES. In 109 women included in the study, those with early-onset breast cancer had a non-significantly higher mortality rate than those with late-onset breast cancer (rate difference 0.03/PY). The hazard of metastasis was significantly lower for the medium SES (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.19–0.69) and the high SES (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18–0.63) than for the low SES group. Compared to late-onset, early-onset cases had no difference in OS or MFS within the first 10 and 2 years following primary diagnosis, respectively. However, early-onset cases had a worse prognosis thereafter. Similarly, high SES was associated with better survival but only after 7.5 and 3 years following primary diagnosis for OS and MFS, respectively. We found a significant effect modification: higher SES mitigates the effect of early-onset status while it offered minimal survival benefit when age at onset was over 65 years. The combination of age at onset and SES may provide long-term prognostic information. As breast cancer survival has improved in recent decades, addressing SES-related social determinants in clinical settings has become increasingly important for optimizing long-term outcomes.

Scientific Reports
Université de Tours (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (FR), Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (FR), Oniris (FR), Unité en Sciences Biologiques et Biotechnologies de Nantes (FR), Université de Rennes (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.