Development of a Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Background: Risk stratification in colorectal cancer (CRC) plays an important role in treatment decision-making. As such, prognostic biomarkers that can augment risk stratification have clinical value. Quantitative histologic features from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) provide a novel avenue for biomarker discovery. In this study, we explored the potential for a computational histology artificial intelligence (CHAI) platform to develop and validate a prognostic biomarker in CRC. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas Colorectal Adenocarcinoma project was utilized for this study, with inclusion of all subjects (stage I–IV) with available digitized H&E specimens. The cohort was split into development and validation cohorts by a stratified random split. The previously developed CHAI platform was applied in the development cohort to construct a continuous risk score from histologic features associated with progression-free interval (PFI) that was dichotomized based on an optimized cutpoint for distinguishing PFI into a high risk CHAI (+) and lower risk CHAI (–). PFI was compared between CHAI (+) and CHAI (–) patients in the validation cohort in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Time-dependent area under the curve (tdAUC) and C-indices were also calculated for PFI. Results: A total of 583 participants were included in the study, with 409 assigned to the validation cohort. The CHAI biomarker classified 229 participants (56%) as CHAI (+) and 180 (44%) as CHAI (–) in the validation set. CHAI (+) participants had worse PFI in a multivariable analysis adjusting for available clinicopathologic variables (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63–4.30). TdAUC for the CHAI biomarker was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.53–0.67) at 12 months, 0.62 (0.55–0.69) at 36 months, and 0.67 (0.55–0.79) at 60 months; the C-index was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58–0.67). Conclusions: The CHAI platform was used to develop a prognostic digital pathology biomarker in CRC. This demonstrates the feasibility and potential to apply this artificial intelligence-based digital pathology biomarker platform for risk stratification in CRC and supports its further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Oncology
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon2823
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Viswesh Krishna, Trevor J. Royce, Vivek Nimgaonkar, Chris Lieu et al.
World Journal of Oncology
AI in cancer detection
article

Development of a Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer in The Cancer Genome Atlas

Viswesh Krishna, Trevor J. Royce, Vivek Nimgaonkar, Chris Lieu, Richard M. Goldberg
article en

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification in colorectal cancer (CRC) plays an important role in treatment decision-making. As such, prognostic biomarkers that can augment risk stratification have clinical value. Quantitative histologic features from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) provide a novel avenue for biomarker discovery. In this study, we explored the potential for a computational histology artificial intelligence (CHAI) platform to develop and validate a prognostic biomarker in CRC. Methods: The Cancer Genome Atlas Colorectal Adenocarcinoma project was utilized for this study, with inclusion of all subjects (stage I–IV) with available digitized H&E specimens. The cohort was split into development and validation cohorts by a stratified random split. The previously developed CHAI platform was applied in the development cohort to construct a continuous risk score from histologic features associated with progression-free interval (PFI) that was dichotomized based on an optimized cutpoint for distinguishing PFI into a high risk CHAI (+) and lower risk CHAI (–). PFI was compared between CHAI (+) and CHAI (–) patients in the validation cohort in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Time-dependent area under the curve (tdAUC) and C-indices were also calculated for PFI. Results: A total of 583 participants were included in the study, with 409 assigned to the validation cohort. The CHAI biomarker classified 229 participants (56%) as CHAI (+) and 180 (44%) as CHAI (–) in the validation set. CHAI (+) participants had worse PFI in a multivariable analysis adjusting for available clinicopathologic variables (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63–4.30). TdAUC for the CHAI biomarker was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.53–0.67) at 12 months, 0.62 (0.55–0.69) at 36 months, and 0.67 (0.55–0.79) at 60 months; the C-index was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58–0.67). Conclusions: The CHAI platform was used to develop a prognostic digital pathology biomarker in CRC. This demonstrates the feasibility and potential to apply this artificial intelligence-based digital pathology biomarker platform for risk stratification in CRC and supports its further study.

World Journal of OncologyVol. 17(5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), West Virginia University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Colorado System (US), Vinzenz Pallotti University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.