Do electoral polls explain the winner–loser gap in political trust? A panel study on polls, election results, and political trust in Belgium

There is an ongoing debate on whether elections boost levels of political trust across the board or exclusively among the “winners” of the elections. The subsequent question is who exactly can be defined as the “winner” of a specific election. In the current study, we report on a panel survey that was conducted both before and after the 2024 general elections in Belgium. Results show that the experience of elections tends to boost levels of political trust, but this effect is stronger among the perceived winners of the elections. Most importantly, we find that this effect depends more strongly on a comparison with published public opinion poll results than on a comparison to the result of previous elections. We argue, therefore, that the winner–loser debate should take into account the effects of polls and mass media communication in shaping voters’ expectations when operationalising winning and losing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481261481099
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Do electoral polls explain the winner–loser gap in political trust? A panel study on polls, election results, and political trust in Belgium

Marc Hooghe, Dieter Stiers
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Do electoral polls explain the winner–loser gap in political trust? A panel study on polls, election results, and political trust in Belgium

Marc Hooghe, Dieter Stiers
article en

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate on whether elections boost levels of political trust across the board or exclusively among the “winners” of the elections. The subsequent question is who exactly can be defined as the “winner” of a specific election. In the current study, we report on a panel survey that was conducted both before and after the 2024 general elections in Belgium. Results show that the experience of elections tends to boost levels of political trust, but this effect is stronger among the perceived winners of the elections. Most importantly, we find that this effect depends more strongly on a comparison with published public opinion poll results than on a comparison to the result of previous elections. We argue, therefore, that the winner–loser debate should take into account the effects of polls and mass media communication in shaping voters’ expectations when operationalising winning and losing.

The British Journal of Politics and International Relations
KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do electoral polls explain the winner–loser gap in political trust? A panel study on polls, election results, and political trust in Belgium — Marc Hooghe, Dieter Stiers · The British Journal of Politics and International Relations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS