Who Decides When to Move On? Learner and System Control in Digital Second-Language Learning: A Structured Review and Conceptual Framework

Digital language-learning systems increasingly decide what should be practised next, when material should be reviewed, and when a learner is ready to move on. Many platforms also let learners make those decisions themselves. This paper reviews ten study families that directly or nearly directly compare learner control, program or adaptive control, and shared forms of control in second- and foreign-language learning. The evidence does not support a universal advantage for either learner or system control. Several relatively direct comparisons suggest benefits of performance-sensitive system guidance for delayed retention or learning efficiency, while unrestricted learner control is not uniformly worse and simple advisement is not consistently useful. Building on this literature, the paper proposes Dynamic Instructional Control Allocation (DICA), a framework in which the degree of learner and system authority can change across learners, tasks, and time. DICA is presented as a set of testable propositions rather than a validated causal model.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22380329
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Who Decides When to Move On? Learner and System Control in Digital Second-Language Learning: A Structured Review and Conceptual Framework

Mintimer Akhmetshin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
preprint

Who Decides When to Move On? Learner and System Control in Digital Second-Language Learning: A Structured Review and Conceptual Framework

Mintimer Akhmetshin
preprint en

Abstract

Digital language-learning systems increasingly decide what should be practised next, when material should be reviewed, and when a learner is ready to move on. Many platforms also let learners make those decisions themselves. This paper reviews ten study families that directly or nearly directly compare learner control, program or adaptive control, and shared forms of control in second- and foreign-language learning. The evidence does not support a universal advantage for either learner or system control. Several relatively direct comparisons suggest benefits of performance-sensitive system guidance for delayed retention or learning efficiency, while unrestricted learner control is not uniformly worse and simple advisement is not consistently useful. Building on this literature, the paper proposes Dynamic Instructional Control Allocation (DICA), a framework in which the degree of learner and system authority can change across learners, tasks, and time. DICA is presented as a set of testable propositions rather than a validated causal model.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.