Proteogenomic profiling defines progression-associated biology in high-risk endometrial cancer

Patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma (HR-EC) experience substantial mortality despite multimodality therapy, molecular classification and contemporary care. We determined whether proteomic tumor programs capture lethal risk beyond established clinical and genomic classifiers and may inform translational investigations. We performed integrated clinical, genomic, and quantitative proteomic profiling of archival FFPE primary tumors from 274 patients with stage I-III HR-EC treated with curative intent and long-term follow-up. Molecular subtyping, clinical-genomic risk modeling, and proteomic analyses evaluated relationships with endometrial cancer (EC)-specific death and progression. A proteomic risk score for progression was developed and validated in 73 independent HR-EC patients. Among patients with non- POLE tumors, TCGA molecular subtype and TP53 mutation status did not significantly stratify progression or EC-specific mortality. Clinical-genomic classification and regression tree analysis identified distinct risk groups with divergent outcomes. Quantitative proteomic profiling identified reproducible tumor programs independently associated with lethal outcomes after adjustment for clinicopathologic and molecular subtypes. Semi-supervised protein clusters classified high vs. low risk of progression in either serous or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma. A proteomic risk score stratified progression risk across training, testing, and independent cohorts and recapitulated adverse proteomic biology. Proteomic integration improved prognostic risk stratification and warrants further validation and translational investigation in HR-EC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Precision Oncology
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-026-01683-9
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proteogenomic profiling defines progression-associated biology in high-risk endometrial cancer

Michele L. Coté, Christopher M. Tarney, Greg Dyson, JJ Ruterbusch et al.
npj Precision Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Proteogenomic profiling defines progression-associated biology in high-risk endometrial cancer

Michele L. Coté, Christopher M. Tarney, Greg Dyson, JJ Ruterbusch, Brian L. Hood, Douglas B. Craig, Thomas P. Conrads, Kathleen M. Darcy, G. Larry Maxwell, Kelly A. Conrads, Katlin Wilson, Rouba Ali-Fehmi, Mohamed Elshaikh, Julie Oliver, Tamara Abulez, Julie Boerner, Sakiyah TaQee, Chunqiao Tian, Daniel Schultz, Nicholas W. Bateman, Sasha Makohon-Moore, Dave Mitchell, Glenn Gist, Tracy Litzi
article en

Abstract

Patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma (HR-EC) experience substantial mortality despite multimodality therapy, molecular classification and contemporary care. We determined whether proteomic tumor programs capture lethal risk beyond established clinical and genomic classifiers and may inform translational investigations. We performed integrated clinical, genomic, and quantitative proteomic profiling of archival FFPE primary tumors from 274 patients with stage I-III HR-EC treated with curative intent and long-term follow-up. Molecular subtyping, clinical-genomic risk modeling, and proteomic analyses evaluated relationships with endometrial cancer (EC)-specific death and progression. A proteomic risk score for progression was developed and validated in 73 independent HR-EC patients. Among patients with non- POLE tumors, TCGA molecular subtype and TP53 mutation status did not significantly stratify progression or EC-specific mortality. Clinical-genomic classification and regression tree analysis identified distinct risk groups with divergent outcomes. Quantitative proteomic profiling identified reproducible tumor programs independently associated with lethal outcomes after adjustment for clinicopathologic and molecular subtypes. Semi-supervised protein clusters classified high vs. low risk of progression in either serous or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma. A proteomic risk score stratified progression risk across training, testing, and independent cohorts and recapitulated adverse proteomic biology. Proteomic integration improved prognostic risk stratification and warrants further validation and translational investigation in HR-EC.

npj Precision Oncology
Inova Health System (US), Henry M. Jackson Foundation (US), Indiana University Health (US), Henry Ford Health System (US), Wayne State University (US), University of Michigan (US), Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Inova Health System, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.