Novel analysis of physics-informed neural networks for solving Cahn-Allen, FitzHugh-Nagumo and Fisher–KPP Models

This paper presents a hybrid semi-analytical/deep-learning framework for nonlinear PDEs, combining the New Iterative Method (NIM) with Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). A truncated NIM series provides a closed-form baseline satisfying the initial condition exactly, while a neural network learns only the residual correction – shown to be one to two orders of magnitude smaller in amplitude than the full solution, which structurally eases the network’s learning task. We evaluate the approach on three nonlinear reaction–diffusion equations: Cahn–Allen equation and FitzHugh–Nagumo equation (cubic reaction terms) and Fisher–KPP equation (quadratic term). Against a matched standard PINN, the hybrid model reduces mean absolute error by roughly an order of magnitude on FitzHugh–Nagumo, by a smaller but consistent margin on Fisher–KPP, and is modestly outperformed by the standard PINN on Cahn–Allen; these results hold across four independent seeds per method, and both PINN-based methods outperform plain NIM truncation on every equation (by threefold to nearly twentyfold). We further validate against an independent finite-difference solver, a depth/width sensitivity study, and a multi-seed noise-robustness study under Gaussian initial-condition perturbation, all at full training scale for all three equations. A convergence analysis for both the NIM series and the hybrid scheme is given, with explicit Lipschitz and local-uniqueness hypotheses, separating analytical truncation error from optimisation error. Together, the results show that coupling a semi-analytical baseline with a physics-informed neural correction is effective for nonlinear reaction–diffusion problems, and precisely characterise where its advantage over a standard PINN is largest, where it disappears, and where it reverses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-69745-3
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel analysis of physics-informed neural networks for solving Cahn-Allen, FitzHugh-Nagumo and Fisher–KPP Models

Azzh Saad Alshehry, Saima Noor, Rasool Shah, Humaira Yasmin
Scientific Reports
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Novel analysis of physics-informed neural networks for solving Cahn-Allen, FitzHugh-Nagumo and Fisher–KPP Models

Azzh Saad Alshehry, Saima Noor, Rasool Shah, Humaira Yasmin
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a hybrid semi-analytical/deep-learning framework for nonlinear PDEs, combining the New Iterative Method (NIM) with Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). A truncated NIM series provides a closed-form baseline satisfying the initial condition exactly, while a neural network learns only the residual correction – shown to be one to two orders of magnitude smaller in amplitude than the full solution, which structurally eases the network’s learning task. We evaluate the approach on three nonlinear reaction–diffusion equations: Cahn–Allen equation and FitzHugh–Nagumo equation (cubic reaction terms) and Fisher–KPP equation (quadratic term). Against a matched standard PINN, the hybrid model reduces mean absolute error by roughly an order of magnitude on FitzHugh–Nagumo, by a smaller but consistent margin on Fisher–KPP, and is modestly outperformed by the standard PINN on Cahn–Allen; these results hold across four independent seeds per method, and both PINN-based methods outperform plain NIM truncation on every equation (by threefold to nearly twentyfold). We further validate against an independent finite-difference solver, a depth/width sensitivity study, and a multi-seed noise-robustness study under Gaussian initial-condition perturbation, all at full training scale for all three equations. A convergence analysis for both the NIM series and the hybrid scheme is given, with explicit Lipschitz and local-uniqueness hypotheses, separating analytical truncation error from optimisation error. Together, the results show that coupling a semi-analytical baseline with a physics-informed neural correction is effective for nonlinear reaction–diffusion problems, and precisely characterise where its advantage over a standard PINN is largest, where it disappears, and where it reverses.

Scientific Reports
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), King Faisal University (SA), Lebanese American University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.