Democratic Dissent: Resistance to Race-Evasive Education Policies Under the 2017–21 Trump Administration
The first Trump administration opposed race-conscious federal educational policies to redress state-sponsored discrimination and related racial inequality. Drawing on extensive qualitative data, we analyzed the mechanisms, collaborations, and strategies used to resist Trump’s first-term civil rights rollbacks for students. Resistance included (a) civil rights oversight and guidance from nongovernment groups, (b) unified messaging to counter attacks on public education, (c) congressional oversight of the Department of Education as well as preservation of its civil rights funding, and (d) litigation on procedural and novel grounds. This study probes how elected officials, intermediary organizations, and civil rights lawyers developed effective strategies and how they might persist today given revitalized federal efforts to abolish race-conscious education policies and constrain students’ civil rights.
Authors
- Kathryn A. McDermott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1730-7175)
- Erica Frankenberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9224-7734)
- Sarah McCollum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7387-9349)
- Janelle Scott
- Elizabeth DeBray (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-0584)
- Sarah Asson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0412-5279)
- Genevieve Siegel‐Hawley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0700-594X)
- April Hewko
- Isaiah Moore
- Talia Leibovitz
Institutions
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Kentucky (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Augusta University (US)
- Education Northwest (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- American Educational Research Journal
- Published
- 2026-09-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312261476642
- Primary Topic
- Critical Race Theory in Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00