Democratic Dissent: Resistance to Race-Evasive Education Policies Under the 2017–21 Trump Administration

The first Trump administration opposed race-conscious federal educational policies to redress state-sponsored discrimination and related racial inequality. Drawing on extensive qualitative data, we analyzed the mechanisms, collaborations, and strategies used to resist Trump’s first-term civil rights rollbacks for students. Resistance included (a) civil rights oversight and guidance from nongovernment groups, (b) unified messaging to counter attacks on public education, (c) congressional oversight of the Department of Education as well as preservation of its civil rights funding, and (d) litigation on procedural and novel grounds. This study probes how elected officials, intermediary organizations, and civil rights lawyers developed effective strategies and how they might persist today given revitalized federal efforts to abolish race-conscious education policies and constrain students’ civil rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312261476642
Primary Topic
Critical Race Theory in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Democratic Dissent: Resistance to Race-Evasive Education Policies Under the 2017–21 Trump Administration

Kathryn A. McDermott, Erica Frankenberg, Sarah McCollum, Janelle Scott et al.
American Educational Research Journal
Critical Race Theory in Education
article

Democratic Dissent: Resistance to Race-Evasive Education Policies Under the 2017–21 Trump Administration

Kathryn A. McDermott, Erica Frankenberg, Sarah McCollum, Janelle Scott, Elizabeth DeBray, Sarah Asson, Genevieve Siegel‐Hawley, April Hewko, Isaiah Moore, Talia Leibovitz
article en

Abstract

The first Trump administration opposed race-conscious federal educational policies to redress state-sponsored discrimination and related racial inequality. Drawing on extensive qualitative data, we analyzed the mechanisms, collaborations, and strategies used to resist Trump’s first-term civil rights rollbacks for students. Resistance included (a) civil rights oversight and guidance from nongovernment groups, (b) unified messaging to counter attacks on public education, (c) congressional oversight of the Department of Education as well as preservation of its civil rights funding, and (d) litigation on procedural and novel grounds. This study probes how elected officials, intermediary organizations, and civil rights lawyers developed effective strategies and how they might persist today given revitalized federal efforts to abolish race-conscious education policies and constrain students’ civil rights.

American Educational Research Journal
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Kentucky (US), University of Georgia (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Augusta University (US), Education Northwest (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Critical Race Theory in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.