Adults have rather stable, yet domain-specific tendencies in social and temporal comparisons

Past research on how people evaluate and compare themselves in central characteristics focuses strongly on preconditions, processes, and consequences of such comparisons while neglecting individual differences. The current study bridges social and personality research by examining domain specificity, temporal stability, and age differences of social and past-temporal comparisons. Using lifespan samples from Germany (N = 313, 18-84 years, 49.8% female) and the USA (N = 302, 18-72 years, 52.0% female), participants reported the frequency and perceived usefulness of social and past-temporal comparisons concerning five domains: emotional stability, extraversion, physical appearance, professional success, and personal life. The results show that individual differences in comparison tendencies were rather domain-specific. Within a specific life domain, the usage of social and past-temporal comparisons was strongly correlated. Individual differences in comparison tendencies were moderately stable over four weeks (~ 0.60). With older age, participants indicated using comparisons less frequently and seeing them as less useful than young adults. We discuss that future research on social and temporal comparisons would benefit from a trait-state approach taking individual differences in domain-specific comparisons and the co-occurrence of social and temporal comparisons into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70006-6
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adults have rather stable, yet domain-specific tendencies in social and temporal comparisons

Cornelia Wrzus, Corina Aguilar‐Raab, Kira S. A. Borgdorf, Gabriela Küchler
Scientific Reports
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Adults have rather stable, yet domain-specific tendencies in social and temporal comparisons

Cornelia Wrzus, Corina Aguilar‐Raab, Kira S. A. Borgdorf, Gabriela Küchler
article en

Abstract

Past research on how people evaluate and compare themselves in central characteristics focuses strongly on preconditions, processes, and consequences of such comparisons while neglecting individual differences. The current study bridges social and personality research by examining domain specificity, temporal stability, and age differences of social and past-temporal comparisons. Using lifespan samples from Germany (N = 313, 18-84 years, 49.8% female) and the USA (N = 302, 18-72 years, 52.0% female), participants reported the frequency and perceived usefulness of social and past-temporal comparisons concerning five domains: emotional stability, extraversion, physical appearance, professional success, and personal life. The results show that individual differences in comparison tendencies were rather domain-specific. Within a specific life domain, the usage of social and past-temporal comparisons was strongly correlated. Individual differences in comparison tendencies were moderately stable over four weeks (~ 0.60). With older age, participants indicated using comparisons less frequently and seeing them as less useful than young adults. We discuss that future research on social and temporal comparisons would benefit from a trait-state approach taking individual differences in domain-specific comparisons and the co-occurrence of social and temporal comparisons into account.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.