Predictors of Men’s Endorsement of Forced Sex Within Marital Unions in India: Sexual Entitlement, Partner Concurrency, and Patriarchal Attitudes

Using nationally representative data from India’s National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019–21), this study examines marital sexual entitlement, operationalized as men’s endorsement that a husband is justified in using force to have sex when a wife refuses. Weighted analyses were restricted to currently married/in-union men and excluded “don’t know/depends” responses on the outcome to enable interpretable comparisons. The primary exposure was recent non-spousal partnering in the past 12 months, coded as reporting at least one sexual partner other than a spouse during that period. Multivariable logistic regression assessed whether recent non-spousal partnering was associated with endorsement of forced sex within marriage/union, adjusting for violence-supportive norms (wife-beating justification), beliefs about women’s sexual refusal autonomy (e.g., whether refusal is justified under specified conditions), and patriarchal attitudes reflecting gendered power and control within intimate relationships. In the base model ( N = 55,588), recent non-spousal partnering was associated with higher odds of endorsing forced sex within marriage/union (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.45, 95% CI [1.17, 1.79]). In an extended model including patriarchal attitude measures ( N = 53,351), the association remained statistically significant (AOR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.05, 1.65]), alongside strong associations with violence-justifying and patriarchal beliefs. Findings suggest that endorsement of forced sex is embedded within broader coercion-accepting and patriarchal normative systems. Prevention efforts should treat marital sexual entitlement as part of a wider constellation of beliefs that legitimize coercion and violence within unions, integrating consent-centred, gender-transformative approaches within sexual and reproductive health and intimate partner violence services and supporting community norm-change strategies that strengthen recognition of women’s sexual refusal autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261473548
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of Men’s Endorsement of Forced Sex Within Marital Unions in India: Sexual Entitlement, Partner Concurrency, and Patriarchal Attitudes

Laksheeta Choudhary
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Predictors of Men’s Endorsement of Forced Sex Within Marital Unions in India: Sexual Entitlement, Partner Concurrency, and Patriarchal Attitudes

Laksheeta Choudhary
article en

Abstract

Using nationally representative data from India’s National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019–21), this study examines marital sexual entitlement, operationalized as men’s endorsement that a husband is justified in using force to have sex when a wife refuses. Weighted analyses were restricted to currently married/in-union men and excluded “don’t know/depends” responses on the outcome to enable interpretable comparisons. The primary exposure was recent non-spousal partnering in the past 12 months, coded as reporting at least one sexual partner other than a spouse during that period. Multivariable logistic regression assessed whether recent non-spousal partnering was associated with endorsement of forced sex within marriage/union, adjusting for violence-supportive norms (wife-beating justification), beliefs about women’s sexual refusal autonomy (e.g., whether refusal is justified under specified conditions), and patriarchal attitudes reflecting gendered power and control within intimate relationships. In the base model ( N = 55,588), recent non-spousal partnering was associated with higher odds of endorsing forced sex within marriage/union (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.45, 95% CI [1.17, 1.79]). In an extended model including patriarchal attitude measures ( N = 53,351), the association remained statistically significant (AOR = 1.32, 95% CI [1.05, 1.65]), alongside strong associations with violence-justifying and patriarchal beliefs. Findings suggest that endorsement of forced sex is embedded within broader coercion-accepting and patriarchal normative systems. Prevention efforts should treat marital sexual entitlement as part of a wider constellation of beliefs that legitimize coercion and violence within unions, integrating consent-centred, gender-transformative approaches within sexual and reproductive health and intimate partner violence services and supporting community norm-change strategies that strengthen recognition of women’s sexual refusal autonomy.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.