Efficacy of sodium channel blockers in treating myotonia is independent of action potential sodium current block

The prevailing view holds that the therapeutic benefit of sodium channel blockers arises from use-dependent inhibition of the transient sodium current (NaT) that is responsible for action potentials. This assumption underlies decades of drug development but has never been directly tested. Our goal was to test this assumption to guide the development of more effective sodium channel blockers. We used a mouse model of myotonia congenita, an ion channelopathy of skeletal muscle, as a system to study mechanism and efficacy of both use-dependent and closed sodium channel blockers. Intracellular current-clamp recordings were used to assess excitability during trains of stimuli. The contributions of NaT and a small, non-inactivating current (Na persistent or NaP) were directly measured with voltage-clamp recordings. At their effective concentrations none of the sodium channel blockers reduced action potential rate of rise or voltage clamp measures of NaT. In contrast at effective concentrations, all sodium channel blockers studied reduced NaP. A computational model was constructed to test the relative effects of NaT and NaP inhibition on excitability. The model confirmed that NaT block alone could not eliminate myotonia without causing hypoexcitability, whereas partial NaP block was sufficient to abolish pathological discharges while preserving normal firing. These findings redefine the therapeutic mechanism of sodium channel blockade: efficacy does not depend on blocking NaT but correlates with the inhibition of NaP. This shift in perspective reframes strategies for sodium channel drug development and suggests a novel approach to treating myotonia, neuropathic pain, cardiac arrythmia and epilepsy. KEY POINTS: At effective doses that treat hyperexcitability, Na channel blockers have little effect on the sodium current responsible for action potentials. Electrophysiologic recordings and computer simulation suggest that block of a small, persistent, sodium current (NaP) is the mechanism underlying efficacy in treating hyperexcitability. These findings suggest that screens for novel sodium channel blockers focus on block of NaP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physiology
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1113/jp290148
Primary Topic
Ion channel regulation and function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy of sodium channel blockers in treating myotonia is independent of action potential sodium current block

Adam S. Deardorff, Mark M. Rich, Xueyong Wang, Andrew A. Voss et al.
The Journal of Physiology
Ion channel regulation and function
article

Efficacy of sodium channel blockers in treating myotonia is independent of action potential sodium current block

Adam S. Deardorff, Mark M. Rich, Xueyong Wang, Andrew A. Voss, Chris Dupont, Samantha Kohli, Brent Foy, Phil Walker, Kaylee M. Pham, Jess Myers
article en

Abstract

The prevailing view holds that the therapeutic benefit of sodium channel blockers arises from use-dependent inhibition of the transient sodium current (NaT) that is responsible for action potentials. This assumption underlies decades of drug development but has never been directly tested. Our goal was to test this assumption to guide the development of more effective sodium channel blockers. We used a mouse model of myotonia congenita, an ion channelopathy of skeletal muscle, as a system to study mechanism and efficacy of both use-dependent and closed sodium channel blockers. Intracellular current-clamp recordings were used to assess excitability during trains of stimuli. The contributions of NaT and a small, non-inactivating current (Na persistent or NaP) were directly measured with voltage-clamp recordings. At their effective concentrations none of the sodium channel blockers reduced action potential rate of rise or voltage clamp measures of NaT. In contrast at effective concentrations, all sodium channel blockers studied reduced NaP. A computational model was constructed to test the relative effects of NaT and NaP inhibition on excitability. The model confirmed that NaT block alone could not eliminate myotonia without causing hypoexcitability, whereas partial NaP block was sufficient to abolish pathological discharges while preserving normal firing. These findings redefine the therapeutic mechanism of sodium channel blockade: efficacy does not depend on blocking NaT but correlates with the inhibition of NaP. This shift in perspective reframes strategies for sodium channel drug development and suggests a novel approach to treating myotonia, neuropathic pain, cardiac arrythmia and epilepsy. KEY POINTS: At effective doses that treat hyperexcitability, Na channel blockers have little effect on the sodium current responsible for action potentials. Electrophysiologic recordings and computer simulation suggest that block of a small, persistent, sodium current (NaP) is the mechanism underlying efficacy in treating hyperexcitability. These findings suggest that screens for novel sodium channel blockers focus on block of NaP.

The Journal of Physiology
Wright State University (US), Wake Forest University (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Ion channel regulation and function
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.