Blue carbon ecosystems under pollution stress: Impacts and integrated carbon‐pollution monitoring

Abstract Coastal blue carbon ecosystems, including mangroves, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes, are globally important carbon sinks because they store organic carbon in vegetation biomass and waterlogged sediments over long timescales. However, nutrient enrichment, heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, macroplastic and microplastic debris, and emerging contaminants increasingly threaten their capacity to sequester carbon. These pollutants reduce photosynthetic productivity, weaken root and rhizome systems, alter sediment redox conditions, disrupt microbial decomposition pathways, and may increase emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). This review synthesizes current evidence on how pollution alters carbon cycling across major blue carbon ecosystems, with emphasis on plant physiology, sediment stability, microbial processes, greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, and carbon stock permanence. It also evaluates monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) approaches that could integrate carbon measurements with pollutant diagnostics. In response to current methodological gaps, the review presents the Pollution‐Carbon Impact Framework (PCIF) as a conceptual decision‐support approach rather than a fully operational protocol. The PCIF is intended to guide future co‐located monitoring, indicator selection, site prioritization, and policy integration, while recognizing that standardized templates, open datasets, validated models, and Geographic Information System (GIS)‐based decision tools remain future requirements. The review concludes that reliable blue carbon accounting requires stronger integration between water‐quality governance, restoration planning, pollution control, and carbon‐credit verification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70661
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blue carbon ecosystems under pollution stress: Impacts and integrated carbon‐pollution monitoring

Ravikumar Jayabal, Srinivas Tadepalli, Sandip Kunar, Anil Kumar Deepati et al.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Blue carbon ecosystems under pollution stress: Impacts and integrated carbon‐pollution monitoring

Ravikumar Jayabal, Srinivas Tadepalli, Sandip Kunar, Anil Kumar Deepati, Barun Haldar, Sakthivel Perumal, Thirugnanasambandham Thangavel, Madaminov Sanjarbek Maxmudjon Ugli
article en

Abstract

Abstract Coastal blue carbon ecosystems, including mangroves, seagrass meadows, and salt marshes, are globally important carbon sinks because they store organic carbon in vegetation biomass and waterlogged sediments over long timescales. However, nutrient enrichment, heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons, macroplastic and microplastic debris, and emerging contaminants increasingly threaten their capacity to sequester carbon. These pollutants reduce photosynthetic productivity, weaken root and rhizome systems, alter sediment redox conditions, disrupt microbial decomposition pathways, and may increase emissions of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), methane (CH 4 ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 O). This review synthesizes current evidence on how pollution alters carbon cycling across major blue carbon ecosystems, with emphasis on plant physiology, sediment stability, microbial processes, greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, and carbon stock permanence. It also evaluates monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) approaches that could integrate carbon measurements with pollutant diagnostics. In response to current methodological gaps, the review presents the Pollution‐Carbon Impact Framework (PCIF) as a conceptual decision‐support approach rather than a fully operational protocol. The PCIF is intended to guide future co‐located monitoring, indicator selection, site prioritization, and policy integration, while recognizing that standardized templates, open datasets, validated models, and Geographic Information System (GIS)‐based decision tools remain future requirements. The review concludes that reliable blue carbon accounting requires stronger integration between water‐quality governance, restoration planning, pollution control, and carbon‐credit verification.

Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Urgench State University (UZ), Chennai Mathematical Institute (IN), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Aditya Birla (India) (IN), Aditya University (IN), Karpagam Academy of Higher Education (IN), Saveetha University (IN), Jazan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.