Bridging User-Technology Fit in Employment Decision Support Tools from Two Approaches: Occupational Analysis and Human Factors Context-of-Use Analysis

Individuals with episodic disabilities experience fluctuations in functional capacity over time. They may encounter challenges meeting the physical, cognitive, and sensory demands of their professional roles. These fluctuations can affect self-awareness, self-efficacy, and self-advocacy during complex employment decisions, including workplace accommodation requests and disability disclosure. Decision support tools (DSTs) may structure these decisions from a systems perspective; however, DST outputs may implicitly assume relatively stable functional capacity. We conducted a systematic qualitative synthesis examining accommodation-seeking experiences among adults with episodic disabilities. Findings indicate that fluctuating symptoms and variable functional performance influence engagement in employment decision-making and may expose assumptions about stability embedded in DST design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261485943
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging User-Technology Fit in Employment Decision Support Tools from Two Approaches: Occupational Analysis and Human Factors Context-of-Use Analysis

Staci Chan, Damaris Vela
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disability Education and Employment
article

Bridging User-Technology Fit in Employment Decision Support Tools from Two Approaches: Occupational Analysis and Human Factors Context-of-Use Analysis

Staci Chan, Damaris Vela
article en

Abstract

Individuals with episodic disabilities experience fluctuations in functional capacity over time. They may encounter challenges meeting the physical, cognitive, and sensory demands of their professional roles. These fluctuations can affect self-awareness, self-efficacy, and self-advocacy during complex employment decisions, including workplace accommodation requests and disability disclosure. Decision support tools (DSTs) may structure these decisions from a systems perspective; however, DST outputs may implicitly assume relatively stable functional capacity. We conducted a systematic qualitative synthesis examining accommodation-seeking experiences among adults with episodic disabilities. Findings indicate that fluctuating symptoms and variable functional performance influence engagement in employment decision-making and may expose assumptions about stability embedded in DST design.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Advocate Christ Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disability Education and Employment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.