Who Should Pay? A Framework for a Fair Distribution of Climate Policy Burdens

We propose a normative framework for distributing the responsibility for national climate mitigation efforts among societal actors. The framework aims to inform national policy, emphasizing how justice considerations – alongside efficiency – can enhance public acceptance of climate policies. We argue that forward-looking responsibility depends on three factors: backward-looking responsibility, benefiting from harmful activities and capacity to mitigate emissions. For backward-looking responsibility we build on a novel account of causality, allowing us to grade actors’ causal contributions, even though climate change is characterized by overdetermination. Using electricity production as an illustration, we show how the proposed framework can help inform fair climate policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics Policy & Environment
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2026.2724785
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Should Pay? A Framework for a Fair Distribution of Climate Policy Burdens

Bengt Brülde, U. Martin Persson, Fredrik Hedenus, Lina Eriksson
Ethics Policy & Environment
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Who Should Pay? A Framework for a Fair Distribution of Climate Policy Burdens

Bengt Brülde, U. Martin Persson, Fredrik Hedenus, Lina Eriksson
article en

Abstract

We propose a normative framework for distributing the responsibility for national climate mitigation efforts among societal actors. The framework aims to inform national policy, emphasizing how justice considerations – alongside efficiency – can enhance public acceptance of climate policies. We argue that forward-looking responsibility depends on three factors: backward-looking responsibility, benefiting from harmful activities and capacity to mitigate emissions. For backward-looking responsibility we build on a novel account of causality, allowing us to grade actors’ causal contributions, even though climate change is characterized by overdetermination. Using electricity production as an illustration, we show how the proposed framework can help inform fair climate policy.

Ethics Policy & Environment
Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Energimyndigheten
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.