A numerical study of the three-way parametric effect of fuel blend, confinement ratio, and operating pressure on swirl stabilised syngas combustion emissions

Reducing pollutant emissions from high-pressure combustion in the power and industrial sectors calls for a shift toward low-carbon fuels such as syngas, a hydrogen (H 2 )–carbon monoxide (CO) mixture whose combustion behaviour is highly sensitive to operating conditions. This study numerically examines the effect of operating pressure (1, 4, 8 bar), confinement ratio (CR 1.5, 2, 3), and fuel blend (75H 2 :25CO, 25H 2 :75CO) on the flow, swirl, and emissions of a swirl-stabilised burner, using a validated Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) coupled with the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) and a 14-species/30-reaction Davis mechanism. Monte Carlo-verified swirl-number and recirculation-zone tracking (CoV 2.5–6.7%) show CR as the dominant driver of jet penetration, while pressure exerts a nonlinear, compressive effect strongest for CO-rich blends via axial momentum flux. Higher pressure and CR shift reaction zones and OH concentration upstream, with H 2 -rich blends burning out fastest and anchoring most stably at CR3, per an OH-centroid stability metric. Despite H 2 's higher heating value, the CO-rich blend delivers 8.4% higher total heat release from greater mass throughput. Chemkin analysis identifies H + O 2 = O + OH as the dominant OH-forming reaction, with pressure sensitivity diverging between blends. Quantitatively, 25H 2 :75CO reaches 1–5% higher peak temperatures but 34–99% higher CO emissions than 75H 2 :25CO; raising pressure from 1 to 8 bar cuts CO by up to 96% but raises NO x by 65–90%, while increasing CR from 1.5 to 3 lowers CO by up to 98%. CO and NO x are jointly minimised at 1 bar and CR3, the optimal low-emission configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Thermal Engineering
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2026.133100
Primary Topic
Combustion and flame dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A numerical study of the three-way parametric effect of fuel blend, confinement ratio, and operating pressure on swirl stabilised syngas combustion emissions

Hoon Kiat Ng, Gianfranco Scribano, Basel Al Bishtawi, Yun Ni Hoh
Applied Thermal Engineering
Combustion and flame dynamics
article

A numerical study of the three-way parametric effect of fuel blend, confinement ratio, and operating pressure on swirl stabilised syngas combustion emissions

Hoon Kiat Ng, Gianfranco Scribano, Basel Al Bishtawi, Yun Ni Hoh
article en

Abstract

Reducing pollutant emissions from high-pressure combustion in the power and industrial sectors calls for a shift toward low-carbon fuels such as syngas, a hydrogen (H 2 )–carbon monoxide (CO) mixture whose combustion behaviour is highly sensitive to operating conditions. This study numerically examines the effect of operating pressure (1, 4, 8 bar), confinement ratio (CR 1.5, 2, 3), and fuel blend (75H 2 :25CO, 25H 2 :75CO) on the flow, swirl, and emissions of a swirl-stabilised burner, using a validated Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) coupled with the Eddy Dissipation Concept (EDC) and a 14-species/30-reaction Davis mechanism. Monte Carlo-verified swirl-number and recirculation-zone tracking (CoV 2.5–6.7%) show CR as the dominant driver of jet penetration, while pressure exerts a nonlinear, compressive effect strongest for CO-rich blends via axial momentum flux. Higher pressure and CR shift reaction zones and OH concentration upstream, with H 2 -rich blends burning out fastest and anchoring most stably at CR3, per an OH-centroid stability metric. Despite H 2 's higher heating value, the CO-rich blend delivers 8.4% higher total heat release from greater mass throughput. Chemkin analysis identifies H + O 2 = O + OH as the dominant OH-forming reaction, with pressure sensitivity diverging between blends. Quantitatively, 25H 2 :75CO reaches 1–5% higher peak temperatures but 34–99% higher CO emissions than 75H 2 :25CO; raising pressure from 1 to 8 bar cuts CO by up to 96% but raises NO x by 65–90%, while increasing CR from 1.5 to 3 lowers CO by up to 98%. CO and NO x are jointly minimised at 1 bar and CR3, the optimal low-emission configuration.

Applied Thermal EngineeringVol. 306
University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus (MY)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Combustion and flame dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.