Validation of Newcastle ENDOPREM for assessing patient experience with colonoscopy: a multicenter prospective study

Patient experience is a key quality indicator for colonoscopy, yet standardized assessment tools are lacking in China. The Newcastle ENDOPREM scale has shown promise internationally but requires validation in China. To translate, adapt, and preliminarily evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Newcastle ENDOPREM (ENDOPREM-CN) to assess colonoscopy patient experience in Chinese patients. This dual-center prospective study followed forward-backward translation principles and cognitive interviewing for adaptation. From April 2024 to April 2026, 296 patients undergoing colonoscopy completed the ENDOPREM-CN. Reliability and validity were assessed, and factors influencing experience were analyzed. Of 301 patients, 296 completed the ENDOPREM-CN. Positive experience was high (98.3%). Phase-specific findings showed 64.2% pre-procedure anxiety, 70.6% unpleasant bowel preparation taste, and, in terms of the post-procedure, 40.9% discomfort and 67.6% result concern. Total scale reliability was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.86, KMO = 0.83); phase reliability ranged from excellent (before test, α = 0.93) to poor (bowel preparation, α = 0.41). Multivariate regression analysis identified factors including adequate information provision and anxiety about abnormal results (both P < 0.01) before the test, better-than-expected bowel preparation taste ( P < 0.01), endoscopist gender preference ( P = 0.05) and explanation about the procedure perceived right to terminate, embarrassment, discomfort frequency during the test (all P < 0.01), explanation of the results and clarity on next steps (both P < 0.01) after the tes t were associated with overall experience. The ENDOPREM-CN shows acceptable overall reliability for measuring Chinese colonoscopy patients’ experiences. Our findings underscore the importance of better patient communication, respecting patients’ right to terminate procedures, and clear post-procedure results and follow-up to improve patient experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05328-w
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Newcastle ENDOPREM for assessing patient experience with colonoscopy: a multicenter prospective study

Wenjing Sun, Wenyan Zhao, Kun Yang, Shicheng Liu et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Validation of Newcastle ENDOPREM for assessing patient experience with colonoscopy: a multicenter prospective study

Wenjing Sun, Wenyan Zhao, Kun Yang, Shicheng Liu, Song Zhao, Xiaoqing Li, Jie Zhou, Bo Liu, Sha Luo, Laura J Neilson, Yuanyuan Jiang, Yan Diao, Colin J Rees, Lishi Zhao, Huali Shu
article en

Abstract

Patient experience is a key quality indicator for colonoscopy, yet standardized assessment tools are lacking in China. The Newcastle ENDOPREM scale has shown promise internationally but requires validation in China. To translate, adapt, and preliminarily evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Newcastle ENDOPREM (ENDOPREM-CN) to assess colonoscopy patient experience in Chinese patients. This dual-center prospective study followed forward-backward translation principles and cognitive interviewing for adaptation. From April 2024 to April 2026, 296 patients undergoing colonoscopy completed the ENDOPREM-CN. Reliability and validity were assessed, and factors influencing experience were analyzed. Of 301 patients, 296 completed the ENDOPREM-CN. Positive experience was high (98.3%). Phase-specific findings showed 64.2% pre-procedure anxiety, 70.6% unpleasant bowel preparation taste, and, in terms of the post-procedure, 40.9% discomfort and 67.6% result concern. Total scale reliability was good (Cronbach’s α = 0.86, KMO = 0.83); phase reliability ranged from excellent (before test, α = 0.93) to poor (bowel preparation, α = 0.41). Multivariate regression analysis identified factors including adequate information provision and anxiety about abnormal results (both P < 0.01) before the test, better-than-expected bowel preparation taste ( P < 0.01), endoscopist gender preference ( P = 0.05) and explanation about the procedure perceived right to terminate, embarrassment, discomfort frequency during the test (all P < 0.01), explanation of the results and clarity on next steps (both P < 0.01) after the tes t were associated with overall experience. The ENDOPREM-CN shows acceptable overall reliability for measuring Chinese colonoscopy patients’ experiences. Our findings underscore the importance of better patient communication, respecting patients’ right to terminate procedures, and clear post-procedure results and follow-up to improve patient experience.

BMC Gastroenterology
Dalian Medical University (CN), South Tyneside District Hospital (GB), Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Third People 's Hospital of Chongqing (CN), Second People’s Hospital of Yibin (CN), Newcastle University (GB), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.