Response Surface Methodology and Life Cycle Assessment of self-compacting mortars incorporating olive pomace bottom ash

Olive pomace bottom ash (OPBA) is a locally available biomass residue that could reduce cement consumption while providing a practical route for agricultural-waste valorisation. This study combined Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to examine the effects of OPBA replacement (0–20%), limestone filler content (10–20%), and water-to-binder ratio (0.45–0.50) on the mechanical, physical and life cycle assessment properties of self-compacting mortars. Seventeen mixtures were evaluated using a central composite design, and quadratic models were developed for compressive strength, water absorption, and four LCA indicators. OPBA was the main factor controlling compressive strength, accounting for 71.20% of the modelled response, followed by the water-to-binder ratio at 17.44%. Increasing OPBA generally reduced strength because of cement dilution and its limited pozzolanic contribution at 28 days. Water absorption was jointly influenced by OPBA, limestone filler, and the water-to-binder ratio, with contributions of 34.74%, 23.50%, and 21.26%, respectively. The compressive-strength model showed good fitting performance and moderate cross-validated predictability (R2 = 0.950, R2pred = 0.606), whereas the water-absorption model showed weaker predictive stability (R2 = 0.902, R2pred = 0.245). Lack-of-fit was not significant for either response. Under the adopted cut-off allocation approach, OPBA was also the dominant factor governing the environmental indicators, accounting for approximately 95.7–99.9% of their modelled variation. Multi-objective optimisation identified a formulation containing 20% limestone filler, 20% OPBA, and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.453, with predicted compressive strength of 40.0 MPa, water absorption of 12.9%, and climate-change impact of 294.7 kg CO2-eq/m3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Environmental and Civil engineering
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2026.2726511
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response Surface Methodology and Life Cycle Assessment of self-compacting mortars incorporating olive pomace bottom ash

Cherif Belebchouche, Nour El Houda Khitas, Ali Makhlouf, Walid Deboucha et al.
European Journal of Environmental and Civil engineering
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Response Surface Methodology and Life Cycle Assessment of self-compacting mortars incorporating olive pomace bottom ash

Cherif Belebchouche, Nour El Houda Khitas, Ali Makhlouf, Walid Deboucha, Mourad Boutlikht, Laura Moretti, Kamel Hebbache, Abdellah Douadi, Abderraouf Messai
article en

Abstract

Olive pomace bottom ash (OPBA) is a locally available biomass residue that could reduce cement consumption while providing a practical route for agricultural-waste valorisation. This study combined Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to examine the effects of OPBA replacement (0–20%), limestone filler content (10–20%), and water-to-binder ratio (0.45–0.50) on the mechanical, physical and life cycle assessment properties of self-compacting mortars. Seventeen mixtures were evaluated using a central composite design, and quadratic models were developed for compressive strength, water absorption, and four LCA indicators. OPBA was the main factor controlling compressive strength, accounting for 71.20% of the modelled response, followed by the water-to-binder ratio at 17.44%. Increasing OPBA generally reduced strength because of cement dilution and its limited pozzolanic contribution at 28 days. Water absorption was jointly influenced by OPBA, limestone filler, and the water-to-binder ratio, with contributions of 34.74%, 23.50%, and 21.26%, respectively. The compressive-strength model showed good fitting performance and moderate cross-validated predictability (R2 = 0.950, R2pred = 0.606), whereas the water-absorption model showed weaker predictive stability (R2 = 0.902, R2pred = 0.245). Lack-of-fit was not significant for either response. Under the adopted cut-off allocation approach, OPBA was also the dominant factor governing the environmental indicators, accounting for approximately 95.7–99.9% of their modelled variation. Multi-objective optimisation identified a formulation containing 20% limestone filler, 20% OPBA, and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.453, with predicted compressive strength of 40.0 MPa, water absorption of 12.9%, and climate-change impact of 294.7 kg CO2-eq/m3.

European Journal of Environmental and Civil engineeringVol. 30(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), University Ferhat Abbas of Setif (DZ), Mouloud Mammeri University of Tizi-Ouzou (DZ), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.