Graph-based representations in modern protein science

For more than 50 years, the linear sequence and the multiple sequence alignment have been the foundational data structures of protein science, and they remain central to homology search, phylogenetic inference, covariance-based contact prediction, and modern protein language models. However, relational and graph-based representations are increasingly being adopted alongside sequence-based methods to capture biological relationships that linear data structures express only implicitly. Proteins fold as three-dimensional residue interaction networks, evolve through high-dimensional genotype networks defined by mutational connectivity, and operate within cellular protein-protein interaction graphs. Here, we review how graph theory is being used to describe and understand these relationships across protein science, with an emphasis on what these methods offer biochemists working on enzyme superfamilies, protein engineering, drug targets, and functional annotation. We trace the development of these ideas from early theoretical topologies, through statistical coupling and the structural network analyses, to the geometric and graph-like representations used in recent machine-learning-driven advances. Throughout, we emphasise that graphs do not replace sequences or MSAs but provide a complementary representation for biochemical relationships that are difficult to express in one dimension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biochemical Journal
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1042/bcj20260179
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Graph-based representations in modern protein science

John Z. Chen, Matthew A. Spence, Mahakaran Sandhu, Colin J. Jackson et al.
Biochemical Journal
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
article

Graph-based representations in modern protein science

John Z. Chen, Matthew A. Spence, Mahakaran Sandhu, Colin J. Jackson, Sacha B. Pulsford, Dana S. Matthews, Barnabas Gall, Anthony Brancewicz
article en

Abstract

For more than 50 years, the linear sequence and the multiple sequence alignment have been the foundational data structures of protein science, and they remain central to homology search, phylogenetic inference, covariance-based contact prediction, and modern protein language models. However, relational and graph-based representations are increasingly being adopted alongside sequence-based methods to capture biological relationships that linear data structures express only implicitly. Proteins fold as three-dimensional residue interaction networks, evolve through high-dimensional genotype networks defined by mutational connectivity, and operate within cellular protein-protein interaction graphs. Here, we review how graph theory is being used to describe and understand these relationships across protein science, with an emphasis on what these methods offer biochemists working on enzyme superfamilies, protein engineering, drug targets, and functional annotation. We trace the development of these ideas from early theoretical topologies, through statistical coupling and the structural network analyses, to the geometric and graph-like representations used in recent machine-learning-driven advances. Throughout, we emphasise that graphs do not replace sequences or MSAs but provide a complementary representation for biochemical relationships that are difficult to express in one dimension.

Biochemical JournalVol. 483(10)
Australian National University (AU), ARC Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science (AU)
Australian Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.