Gas‐Hydrate Reservoir Identification in Permafrost Regions Using a GWO‐Optimized LightGBM Model

ABSTRACT Accurate identification of gas‐hydrate‐bearing layers in permafrost regions is critical for gas‐hydrate exploration and development. Conventional well‐logging methods are often affected by lithology, pore structure, and other interfering factors, leading to complex and ambiguous responses that hinder precise evaluation of gas‐hydrate saturation. Machine learning models offer an automated approach to well‐logging interpretation, improving efficiency and reducing dependence on expert knowledge. In this study, four models—Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and K ‐nearest neighbors ( K NN)—are optimized using the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) algorithm and subsequently compared. The results demonstrate that the GWO–LightGBM model achieves an overall identification accuracy of 97.14%. For the gas‐hydrate class (the positive class), it yields an F 1‐score of 84.82%. The proposed model significantly outperforms the other three comparison models. Furthermore, validation using independent well data and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis confirms the excellent generalization ability and interpretability of the proposed model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Petroleum Geology
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpg.70129
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gas‐Hydrate Reservoir Identification in Permafrost Regions Using a GWO‐Optimized LightGBM Model

Zhenquan Lu, Changchun Zou, Pengbo Yang, Kun Xiao et al.
Journal of Petroleum Geology
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Gas‐Hydrate Reservoir Identification in Permafrost Regions Using a GWO‐Optimized LightGBM Model

Zhenquan Lu, Changchun Zou, Pengbo Yang, Kun Xiao, Rong He, Dening Yin, Huimin Zuo, Chen Qian
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate identification of gas‐hydrate‐bearing layers in permafrost regions is critical for gas‐hydrate exploration and development. Conventional well‐logging methods are often affected by lithology, pore structure, and other interfering factors, leading to complex and ambiguous responses that hinder precise evaluation of gas‐hydrate saturation. Machine learning models offer an automated approach to well‐logging interpretation, improving efficiency and reducing dependence on expert knowledge. In this study, four models—Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), support vector machine (SVM), and K ‐nearest neighbors ( K NN)—are optimized using the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) algorithm and subsequently compared. The results demonstrate that the GWO–LightGBM model achieves an overall identification accuracy of 97.14%. For the gas‐hydrate class (the positive class), it yields an F 1‐score of 84.82%. The proposed model significantly outperforms the other three comparison models. Furthermore, validation using independent well data and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis confirms the excellent generalization ability and interpretability of the proposed model.

Journal of Petroleum Geology
China Geological Survey (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), East China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.