How Chinese EFL learners acquire the secondary meanings of words: effect of practice types and semantic relevance

This study examines how native Chinese speakers learn secondary meanings of English vocabulary, with a focus on word meaning types (polysemous words and homonyms) and learning activities (flashcards and fill-in-the-blank exercises). A controlled experimental design was adopted, in which learners completed learning tasks followed by immediate and delayed post-tests measuring recognition accuracy and reaction time. The result show lexical meaning type did not lead to differences in final learning outcomes. However, differences emerged in the learning process: homonyms tended to support better immediate recognition, whereas polysemous words showed relatively faster retrieval in delayed processing. Both instructional conditions improved performance compared with their respective control groups, but their effects were mainly observed in immediate testing and did not consistently persist over time. The findings suggest that both lexical meaning types and learning activities shape the temporal course of secondary meaning acquisition rather than final attainment. Flashcards appear more effective for acquiring initial form-meaning links, while contextualized tasks may facilitate early semantic processing, although neither approach showed a sustained advantage in retention over a one-week delay.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107736
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Chinese EFL learners acquire the secondary meanings of words: effect of practice types and semantic relevance

Hongli Xue, Kun Li, Qinqin Meng, Xinin Gu
Acta Psychologica
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

How Chinese EFL learners acquire the secondary meanings of words: effect of practice types and semantic relevance

Hongli Xue, Kun Li, Qinqin Meng, Xinin Gu
article en

Abstract

This study examines how native Chinese speakers learn secondary meanings of English vocabulary, with a focus on word meaning types (polysemous words and homonyms) and learning activities (flashcards and fill-in-the-blank exercises). A controlled experimental design was adopted, in which learners completed learning tasks followed by immediate and delayed post-tests measuring recognition accuracy and reaction time. The result show lexical meaning type did not lead to differences in final learning outcomes. However, differences emerged in the learning process: homonyms tended to support better immediate recognition, whereas polysemous words showed relatively faster retrieval in delayed processing. Both instructional conditions improved performance compared with their respective control groups, but their effects were mainly observed in immediate testing and did not consistently persist over time. The findings suggest that both lexical meaning types and learning activities shape the temporal course of secondary meaning acquisition rather than final attainment. Flashcards appear more effective for acquiring initial form-meaning links, while contextualized tasks may facilitate early semantic processing, although neither approach showed a sustained advantage in retention over a one-week delay.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 270
Anhui Normal University (CN)
Anhui Normal University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.