Distance and Discrepancy in Online Reviews: How Temporal and Tone Gaps Influence Managerial Response Behavior

Online managerial responses to consumer reviews benefit businesses. However, given time, personnel, and budget constraints, managers facing numerous reviews must decide which to respond to and how. Our findings suggest that the content, linguistic characteristics, and contextual features of online reviews significantly shape managerial response behavior. Reviews that are highly relevant to product and service attributes, as well as those with lower sentiment or readability, increase managers’ likelihood of responding. Additionally, several relevance dimensions and linguistic complexity encourage standardized responses, whereas experience-related reviews are related to more customized responses. Contextual factors further moderate these effects: greater temporal distance, measured as the time gap between the review posting date and the consumption date, strengthens the impact of review relevance on response likelihood but reduces the influence of sentiment and relevance on both responsiveness and response strategy. Moreover, greater tone distance, measured by the discrepancy between ratings and sentiment in textual comments, amplifies the effect of negative sentiment on managerial responses while weakening the effect of review relevance on the preference for standardized replies. Our findings urge managers to consider the content and contextual features of online reviews when developing effective responses that generate positive electronic word of mouth to benefit businesses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Internet Commerce
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2026.2723159
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distance and Discrepancy in Online Reviews: How Temporal and Tone Gaps Influence Managerial Response Behavior

Yiming Zhuang, Yiru Wang, Xun Xu
Journal of Internet Commerce
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Distance and Discrepancy in Online Reviews: How Temporal and Tone Gaps Influence Managerial Response Behavior

Yiming Zhuang, Yiru Wang, Xun Xu
article en

Abstract

Online managerial responses to consumer reviews benefit businesses. However, given time, personnel, and budget constraints, managers facing numerous reviews must decide which to respond to and how. Our findings suggest that the content, linguistic characteristics, and contextual features of online reviews significantly shape managerial response behavior. Reviews that are highly relevant to product and service attributes, as well as those with lower sentiment or readability, increase managers’ likelihood of responding. Additionally, several relevance dimensions and linguistic complexity encourage standardized responses, whereas experience-related reviews are related to more customized responses. Contextual factors further moderate these effects: greater temporal distance, measured as the time gap between the review posting date and the consumption date, strengthens the impact of review relevance on response likelihood but reduces the influence of sentiment and relevance on both responsiveness and response strategy. Moreover, greater tone distance, measured by the discrepancy between ratings and sentiment in textual comments, amplifies the effect of negative sentiment on managerial responses while weakening the effect of review relevance on the preference for standardized replies. Our findings urge managers to consider the content and contextual features of online reviews when developing effective responses that generate positive electronic word of mouth to benefit businesses.

Journal of Internet Commerce
Frostburg State University (US), Central Connecticut State University (US), San Jose State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.