Lithium solvation and interfacial structure in a ternary carbonate electrolyte at electrified graphite interface: Constant charge vs constant potential molecular dynamics

Multicomponent carbonate electrolytes are central to next generation electrochemical energy storage devices, and the choice of electrode model strongly shapes their predicted interfacial behavior. This study compares the constant charge method (CCM) and constant potential method (CPM) for modeling electrified interfaces in such electrolytes. Molecular dynamic simulations are performed for 1 M LiPF6 in an ethylene carbonate:dimethyl carbonate:ethyl methyl carbonate ternary carbonate electrolyte sandwiched between two graphite electrodes. Results show that CCM and CPM give nearly identical interfacial structures at low and moderate polarization, with clear deviations emerging at ±1.35 V, equivalent to a 2.70 V cell voltage. This method-dependent response originates mainly from Li+ behavior at the negative electrode, where CCM promotes partial desolvation and contact-like adsorption, whereas CPM preserves solvent separated adsorption through dynamic charge redistribution and stronger interfacial solvent ordering. Meanwhile, PF6- distributions remain comparatively insensitive to electrode treatment. This study defines the polarization regime where CCM is sufficient and establishes when CPM is required to capture coupled Li+/solvent/electrode interactions in carbonate solvent-based energy storage electrolytes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0350219
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lithium solvation and interfacial structure in a ternary carbonate electrolyte at electrified graphite interface: Constant charge vs constant potential molecular dynamics

Malak Abid Ali Khan, Bing-Ang Mei, Lixiang Zhong, Jingyu Li et al.
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Advancements in Battery Materials
article

Lithium solvation and interfacial structure in a ternary carbonate electrolyte at electrified graphite interface: Constant charge vs constant potential molecular dynamics

Malak Abid Ali Khan, Bing-Ang Mei, Lixiang Zhong, Jingyu Li, Muhammad Hamza
article en

Abstract

Multicomponent carbonate electrolytes are central to next generation electrochemical energy storage devices, and the choice of electrode model strongly shapes their predicted interfacial behavior. This study compares the constant charge method (CCM) and constant potential method (CPM) for modeling electrified interfaces in such electrolytes. Molecular dynamic simulations are performed for 1 M LiPF6 in an ethylene carbonate:dimethyl carbonate:ethyl methyl carbonate ternary carbonate electrolyte sandwiched between two graphite electrodes. Results show that CCM and CPM give nearly identical interfacial structures at low and moderate polarization, with clear deviations emerging at ±1.35 V, equivalent to a 2.70 V cell voltage. This method-dependent response originates mainly from Li+ behavior at the negative electrode, where CCM promotes partial desolvation and contact-like adsorption, whereas CPM preserves solvent separated adsorption through dynamic charge redistribution and stronger interfacial solvent ordering. Meanwhile, PF6- distributions remain comparatively insensitive to electrode treatment. This study defines the polarization regime where CCM is sufficient and establishes when CPM is required to capture coupled Li+/solvent/electrode interactions in carbonate solvent-based energy storage electrolytes.

The Journal of Chemical PhysicsVol. 165(9)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute (CN)
Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Advancements in Battery Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.