Playing with Kruskal: A State-of-the-Art Report on Watershed Cuts

Abstract In the framework of edge-weighted graphs, watersheds have proven to be linked to well-known optimization problems, as Minimum Spanning Tree, which allowed the design of efficient algorithms for computing (hierarchical) watershed segmentations. In the present article, after reviewing the literature related to watershed segmentation, we present a detailed end-to-end pipeline of algorithms to compute (hierarchical) watershed segmentations, starting from the computation of graph-based image representations, up to the computation of connected components of the final (hierarchical) segmentation. We consider the several variations of watersheds, including their supervised and unsupervised versions, and the various ways of computing seeds, to name a few. For the first time, we bring together all these watershed notions and algorithms in a compact and understandable way. We aim at providing a reference for those interested in employing and reimplementing the watershed segmentation framework for their task at hand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10851-026-01347-0
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Playing with Kruskal: A State-of-the-Art Report on Watershed Cuts

Benjamin Perret, Deise Santana Maia, Jean Cousty, Laurent Najman
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Playing with Kruskal: A State-of-the-Art Report on Watershed Cuts

Benjamin Perret, Deise Santana Maia, Jean Cousty, Laurent Najman
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the framework of edge-weighted graphs, watersheds have proven to be linked to well-known optimization problems, as Minimum Spanning Tree, which allowed the design of efficient algorithms for computing (hierarchical) watershed segmentations. In the present article, after reviewing the literature related to watershed segmentation, we present a detailed end-to-end pipeline of algorithms to compute (hierarchical) watershed segmentations, starting from the computation of graph-based image representations, up to the computation of connected components of the final (hierarchical) segmentation. We consider the several variations of watersheds, including their supervised and unsupervised versions, and the various ways of computing seeds, to name a few. For the first time, we bring together all these watershed notions and algorithms in a compact and understandable way. We aim at providing a reference for those interested in employing and reimplementing the watershed segmentation framework for their task at hand.

Journal of Mathematical Imaging and VisionVol. 68(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Université de Lille (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique Gaspard-Monge (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Playing with Kruskal: A State-of-the-Art Report on Watershed Cuts — Benjamin Perret, Deise Santana Maia, et al. · Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS